TexasCHLforum.com

Huffines for unlicensed open carry. Pulled.

Amendment #8 Huffines.............Unlicsensed carry.

I'm amazed how some of these legislators appear to be so uninformed. Is it just for show? Are are they really that way?

I think the opposition will offer all 22 amendments as they did when debating SB 17. They know all 22 amendments will be tabled, but they are doing this to "save face", just to say "well, we tried".

Now Sen. Huffines is doing is impression of Rep. Stickland. He and Stickland BTW, took campaign money from NAGR/Dudley Brown. Perhaps he has just earned it.

Chas.

Huffines trying to bring back Dutton amendment.

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Now Sen. Huffines is doing is impression of Rep. Stickland. He and Stickland BTW, took campaign money from NAGR/Dudley Brown. Perhaps he has just earned it.

Chas.

Funny, I can't see any sponsorship stickers on his suit

Huffines trying to put the Dutton amendment back in. Canvasback beat me to it.

If they add the Dutton amendment back on, would the bill have to go back to the house for a vote?

rehashing these amendments.....that clinches it....I don't have the patients to be a rep

Maybe Sen. Ellis should drink more of the tea.

Am I right that if 910 passes with the Dutton amendment that 910 goes directly to Abbott?

TXBO wrote:Am I right that if 910 passes with the Dutton amendment that 910 goes directly to Abbott?

Good question.

TXBO wrote:Am I right that if 910 passes with the Dutton amendment that 910 goes directly to Abbott?

I'm curious about that - I could see the Democratic senators supporting this amendment if that means the bill gets kicked back to the House (and delayed, and maybe never make it to the gov's desk).

TXBO wrote:Am I right that if 910 passes with the Dutton amendment that 910 goes directly to Abbott?

As I understand it.....straight to Abbot....