TexasCHLforum.com

OldCannon wrote:This isn't PTSD.

Everything that I've seen so far tells me
a) The dirtbag PLANNED to kill them
b) He intends to capitalize on the "hero worship" that the media gives to killers.

Looks like he succeeded at both.

I will NEVER repeat his name, and I will not link to any article that gives him "in depth" analysis.

He deserves to rot in a cell, forgotten, and buried in an unmarked grave in an unknown location.

03Lightningrocks wrote:

K.Mooneyham wrote:

baldeagle wrote:I can't wrap my head around this. I hope the shooter tries to explain why he did it, because it makes no sense to me at all. Chris was trying to help him. The thanks he gets is being shot to death? It might be PTSD, but there's got to be more to it.

I read an article that said the killer used a handgun to murder Kyle and Littlefield. And Kyle was reported to have been set to teach a "precision rifle class", not handguns. So, if true, it would at least seem that the killer must have had handgun on him loaded when he arrived at the range, and it was concealed. That, to me, is NOT PTSD, but premeditated murder...and if that is true, then what was the motive? I hope this guy makes it to trial.

I am no attorney so I have to ask. Would calling it PTSD be an out that would be similar to pleading insanity?

Ron Paul's Twitter wrote:Chris Kyle's death seems to confirm that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword." Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense

donkey wrote:Glad that Ron Paul can stay classy at a time like this.

Ron Paul's Twitter wrote:Chris Kyle's death seems to confirm that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword." Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense

http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/04/ron-p ... the-sword/

donkey wrote:Glad that Ron Paul can stay classy at a time like this.

Ron Paul's Twitter wrote:Chris Kyle's death seems to confirm that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword." Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense

http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/04/ron-p ... the-sword/

Redneck_Buddha wrote:

donkey wrote:Glad that Ron Paul can stay classy at a time like this.

Ron Paul's Twitter wrote:Chris Kyle's death seems to confirm that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword." Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense

http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/04/ron-p ... the-sword/

Wow...that's disgusting. I was actually considering supporting him at one point, but not a chance in Hades now.

anygunanywhere wrote:

Redneck_Buddha wrote:

donkey wrote:Glad that Ron Paul can stay classy at a time like this.

Ron Paul's Twitter wrote:Chris Kyle's death seems to confirm that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword." Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense

http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/04/ron-p ... the-sword/

Wow...that's disgusting. I was actually considering supporting him at one point, but not a chance in Hades now.

That is daddy Ron not sonny boy Rand.

Anygunanywhere

Redneck_Buddha wrote:The Paulites refuse to acknowledge that Ron would green light this tweet.

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Redneck_Buddha wrote:The Paulites refuse to acknowledge that Ron would green light this tweet.

That's just ridiculous. Who else would have had access his account, if it has been compromised, why now, and not earlier when he was running for POTUS? I'm afraid that this disgusting statement is perfectly in line with RON Paul's prior statements about anything having to do with Iraq/Afghanistan/WOT/Foreign Policy, and I'm guessing that RAND Paul is wincing and just wishing his dad would shut his pie-hole.

Redneck_Buddha wrote: I doubt that Ron Paul directly updates his own tweets. These accounts are usually maintained and updated by staffers and are generally carefully crafted by advisors. Not saying that is the case here, but this is how it usually works with high profile politicians, celeb-u-trash, etc.

G26ster wrote:

Redneck_Buddha wrote: I doubt that Ron Paul directly updates his own tweets. These accounts are usually maintained and updated by staffers and are generally carefully crafted by advisors. Not saying that is the case here, but this is how it usually works with high profile politicians, celeb-u-trash, etc.

What staff? He retired from Congress last year.

Redneck_Buddha wrote:

G26ster wrote:

Redneck_Buddha wrote: I doubt that Ron Paul directly updates his own tweets. These accounts are usually maintained and updated by staffers and are generally carefully crafted by advisors. Not saying that is the case here, but this is how it usually works with high profile politicians, celeb-u-trash, etc.

What staff? He retired from Congress last year.

He is now executive director of Campaign for Liberty. He is still politically active and wealthy. You think he is just sitting on the couch watching Oprah and randomly tweeting all day?

G26ster wrote:

Redneck_Buddha wrote:

G26ster wrote:

Redneck_Buddha wrote: I doubt that Ron Paul directly updates his own tweets. These accounts are usually maintained and updated by staffers and are generally carefully crafted by advisors. Not saying that is the case here, but this is how it usually works with high profile politicians, celeb-u-trash, etc.

What staff? He retired from Congress last year.

He is now executive director of Campaign for Liberty. He is still politically active and wealthy. You think he is just sitting on the couch watching Oprah and randomly tweeting all day?

I wish he would