TexasCHLforum.com

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

Russell wrote:As an aside, that article did drive a bit of traffic to my site. It also resulted in an increase in support tickets getting opened by clueless business owners asking for me to send them a 30.06 sign.

Just as I feared. Anyone still doubt that the in-your-face tactics to support open-carry hurt not only open-carry but concealed-carry as well?

Chas.

03Lightningrocks wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

Russell wrote:As an aside, that article did drive a bit of traffic to my site. It also resulted in an increase in support tickets getting opened by clueless business owners asking for me to send them a 30.06 sign.

Just as I feared. Anyone still doubt that the in-your-face tactics to support open-carry hurt not only open-carry but concealed-carry as well?

Chas.

I'm not allowed to say. But I suppose I can simply post without getting in trouble again.

Greybeard wrote:I much prefer the days not all that long ago when "OC" stood for Olesporin Capsicum.

Russell wrote:As an aside, that article did drive a bit of traffic to my site. It also resulted in an increase in support tickets getting opened by clueless business owners asking for me to send them a 30.06 sign

I always respond with something along the lines of all they would accomplish by doing that is discriminating against their most law-abiding customers, criminals by their very definition care very little about signs. Unsurprisingly I never get a response back.