The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
mojo84 wrote:Yeah, but I have too many other conflicts with Johnson. Plus, he has much less of a chance than Trump.SewTexas wrote:Y'all do realize there is a 3rd party that is pro-gun....right? And Johnson is gaining ground.
Here are a couple of reasons. There's nothing conservative about Johnson on issues that conservatives hold dear. Plus, I despise most of the LP Platform.SewTexas wrote:mojo84 wrote:Yeah, but I have too many other conflicts with Johnson. Plus, he has much less of a chance than Trump.SewTexas wrote:Y'all do realize there is a 3rd party that is pro-gun....right? And Johnson is gaining ground.
I'm not sure what they could be. He's actually more conservative than The Donald in many areas. ....and they are now talking about allowing him into the debates, so his polling numbers are going up.
And this: http://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/05/31 ... amendment/Gary Johnson wrote:Even so, Johnson also says he has a "nuanced" view of the Libertarian Party platform plank, which opposes "all laws at any level of government" restricting guns. "We should be open to a discussion on keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill," he says. "I don't know how that manifests itself, but I'm looking to get elected president of the United States. I just want to let people know I have an open mind about how we might, how government might, interject itself in a lot of the problems we have." http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli ... /85982250/
Gary Johnson, assault weapons ban & rolling back gun laws wrote: Is Johnson a realistic Second Amendment alternative to Clinton and Trump?
6/23/16 | by Jared Morgan
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson (right) and running mate Bill Weld in a town hall hosted by CNN Wednesday night. (Photo: CNN)
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson (right) and running mate Bill Weld in a town hall hosted by CNN Wednesday night. (Photo: CNN)
Libertarian presidential candidate and former governor of New Mexico Gary Johnson during a CNN town hall Wednesday night defended current gun control laws, saying he would not seek to roll them back should he be elected into office.
Johnson was joined by running mate Bill Weld, former governor of Massachusetts, and said he could support an assault weapons ban, but would not support outlawing semi-automatic rifles. http://www.guns.com/2016/06/23/is-johns ... -to-trump/
AS I said, your sources are suspect at best.parabelum wrote:Because George Staphylococcus "forgot" to mention this:
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... -scandals/
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... migration/
What do you mean? Trumpbart is totally reliable.WTR wrote:AS I said, your sources are suspect at best.
I agree and he's wrong on everything that matters. Look at my edited post with more information.SewTexas wrote:This election needs to be able more than one or two issues.
So that's the same as a vote for Hillary. IMHOlildave40 wrote:This year I have made my decision on who I am voting for. This year I am voting for Pedro as I cant stand for kilary and have lost faith in trump.
In all honesty, are any sources truly reliable these days? I look at everything, Huffpost, CNN, Fox, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Blaze, Guardian -- every single one at least spins their stories to their pleasure. Some more than others - and apparently some really badly!v7a wrote:What do you mean? Trumpbart is totally reliable.WTR wrote:AS I said, your sources are suspect at best.
Yes it does. Plus, I'm more than a little tired of Johnson supporters pretending that he and the LP would be good for the country. They would be as bad for America as Hillary, but just in a different way. Look at the entire LP Platform, not just the one or two parts you like. https://www.lp.org/platformTexasJohnBoy wrote:And, if you really think he's got a chance, look at this:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls ... -5949.html
See that 12%? Looks an awful lot like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St ... tion,_1992
TexasJohnBoy wrote: Pretty sure someone mentioned this already.
He only serves to split the Republican vote. He's not a viable candidate in our system as it stands, or any third party for that matter, and I don't see that changing any time soon.