Word use that drives you up the wall!

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
puma guy
Senior Member
Posts: 7911
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by puma guy »

Being one myself I am always perplexed as to how many folk are referenced when some one says " a pair of twins". Is it two or four?
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
User avatar
RogueUSMC
Senior Member
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:55 pm
Location: Smith County
Contact:

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by RogueUSMC »

puma guy wrote:Being one myself I am always perplexed as to how many folk are referenced when some one says " a pair of twins". Is it two or four?
Or whether they are drunk or sober (how many twins do you see?)
A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
TomsTXCHL
Senior Member
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by TomsTXCHL »

For me during football season it's that Troy Aikman he can't stop himself such that Joe Buck he has picked-up on it himself. I wonder if Troy Aikman he never went to grammar school fer cryan' out loud. Troy Aikman he makes my ears curl.

:p
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by WildBill »

puma guy wrote:Being one myself I am always perplexed as to how many folk are referenced when some one says " a pair of twins". Is it two or four?
What about a pair of pants, scissors or pliers? ;-)
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar
Wolverine
Member
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 6:57 pm

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by Wolverine »

While we're on this subject, I always wondered if one of them dies, is the other still a twin?
"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty."
III
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by Oldgringo »

WildBill wrote:
puma guy wrote:Being one myself I am always perplexed as to how many folk are referenced when some one says " a pair of twins". Is it two or four?
What about a pair of pants, scissors or pliers? ;-)
I've often wondered about that my own self. :roll:
User avatar
Dadtodabone
Senior Member
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by Dadtodabone »

Oldgringo wrote:
WildBill wrote:
puma guy wrote:Being one myself I am always perplexed as to how many folk are referenced when some one says " a pair of twins". Is it two or four?
What about a pair of pants, scissors or pliers? ;-)
I've often wondered about that my own self. :roll:
Pants/Trousers evolved from fitted stockings, pantaloons/trews, that were made and donned individually. Long tunics would cover the join for warmth and modesty's sake.
Parenthetically it was the shortening of the tunic during the Medieval Warm Period, that led to the creation of the codpiece which joined the pairs.
A modern iteration of the codpiece can be found in the U.S. Navy enlisted mans trousers.
http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/s ... 01_92.aspx

Instruments and tools which feature identical limbs which are joined have always been referred to in the plural. Calipers, tweezers, scissors, pliers. Scissors is a plural noun; thus "a scissors" would be wrong. To refer indefinitely to one unit, one should always use pair, as in "a pair of scissors". With the definite article the and the plural adjectives these and those, pair does not have to be used: those scissors are terrible, try these scissors, the scissors are bad, etc.
"Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris!"
User avatar
Dadtodabone
Senior Member
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by Dadtodabone »

Wolverine wrote:While we're on this subject, I always wondered if one of them dies, is the other still a twin?
Yes, though referred to as "remaining" or "twinless".
"Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris!"
User avatar
RogueUSMC
Senior Member
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:55 pm
Location: Smith County
Contact:

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by RogueUSMC »

Dadtodabone wrote:
Oldgringo wrote:
WildBill wrote:
puma guy wrote:Being one myself I am always perplexed as to how many folk are referenced when some one says " a pair of twins". Is it two or four?
What about a pair of pants, scissors or pliers? ;-)
I've often wondered about that my own self. :roll:
Pants/Trousers evolved from fitted stockings, pantaloons/trews, that were made and donned individually. Long tunics would cover the join for warmth and modesty's sake.
Parenthetically it was the shortening of the tunic during the Medieval Warm Period, that led to the creation of the codpiece which joined the pairs.
A modern iteration of the codpiece can be found in the U.S. Navy enlisted mans trousers.
http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/s ... 01_92.aspx

Instruments and tools which feature identical limbs which are joined have always been referred to in the plural. Calipers, tweezers, scissors, pliers. Scissors is a plural noun; thus "a scissors" would be wrong. To refer indefinitely to one unit, one should always use pair, as in "a pair of scissors". With the definite article the and the plural adjectives these and those, pair does not have to be used: those scissors are terrible, try these scissors, the scissors are bad, etc.
Wow...you spent time on this...lol
A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
User avatar
puma guy
Senior Member
Posts: 7911
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by puma guy »

Dadtodabone wrote:
Wolverine wrote:While we're on this subject, I always wondered if one of them dies, is the other still a twin?
Yes, though referred to as "remaining" or "twinless".
Since my brother was born 15 minutes before me he always refers to me as the twin and himself as the original. :lol:
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
User avatar
Dadtodabone
Senior Member
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by Dadtodabone »

RogueUSMC wrote: Wow...you spent time on this...lol
5-10 minutes? I'm a frustrated History major with a captive audience and a very good memory.
"Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris!"
User avatar
Dadtodabone
Senior Member
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by Dadtodabone »

puma guy wrote:
Dadtodabone wrote:
Wolverine wrote:While we're on this subject, I always wondered if one of them dies, is the other still a twin?
Yes, though referred to as "remaining" or "twinless".
Since my brother was born 15 minutes before me he always refers to me as the twin and himself as the original. :lol:
That is funny! I've never heard that before!
"Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris!"
User avatar
RogueUSMC
Senior Member
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:55 pm
Location: Smith County
Contact:

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by RogueUSMC »

Dadtodabone wrote:
RogueUSMC wrote: Wow...you spent time on this...lol
5-10 minutes? I'm a frustrated History major with a captive audience and a very good memory.
Is there any other kind of history major?
A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
User avatar
fickman
Senior Member
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by fickman »

This one isn't based on misuse of a term, but I'll admit that I hate the word "pistol". I never use it. I cringe when I hear it. I can't explain further.

Gun.
Handgun.
Firearm.
Revolver.
Wheelgun.
Rifle.
Carbine.
Shotgun.
Scattergun.
Big iron.
Heat (I won't use it, but go ahead if you must).
Gat (Same as above).
Piece.
etc., etc., etc.

Use any synonym, euphemism, or colloquialism that you want and I'll go right along. Say "pistol" and I'll look like I just ate a lemon.
Native Texian
User avatar
Skiprr
Moderator
Posts: 6458
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: Outskirts of Houston

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

Post by Skiprr »

fickman wrote:This one isn't based on misuse of a term, but I'll admit that I hate the word "pistol". I never use it. I cringe when I hear it. I can't explain further.
Hm. I know you said you can't explain further, but this one's interesting. The use of the term "pistol" for a handheld firearm predates "revolver" by over 250 years. When Samuel Colt received his patent in 1836 for an innovative new handgun, he deemed it the "revolving-cylinder pistol."

Per the Gun Control Act (18 U.S.C., §921(A)(29) and 27 CFR §478.11):
The term "Pistol" means a weapon originally designed, made, and intended to fire a projectile (bullet) from one or more barrels when held in one hand, and having:
  • a chamber(s) as an integral part(s) of, or permanently aligned with, the bore(s);
  • and a short stock designed to be gripped by one hand at an angle to and extending below the line of the bore(s).
Though the definition has morphed since its first use in 1570, the term "pistol" seems still to serve a purpose.
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”