TexasCHLforum.com

RHenriksen wrote:

v7a wrote:[ Image ]

Okay, then my guess is to ensure that the change in penalty from class A misdemeanor to Class C for walking past a 30.06 sign will apply to both 30.06 and 30.07 signs.

The amendment applies to both so written

Here we go, don't work today so I can actually watch!

What are you all watching the feed I see is about HB1690

suthdj wrote:What are you all watching the feed I see is about HB1690

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... nt_id=1415" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

joe817 wrote:

suthdj wrote:What are you all watching the feed I see is about HB1690

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... nt_id=1415" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

They are not on HB 910 yet

gdanaher wrote:Perhaps move the date of enactment from Sept 1 to January 1 to agree with Senate?

Jan 1 already happened in House Committee. His bill WAS identical to the senate bill at the start on Friday... but there was one amendment made on Friday, and possibly more today.

Can't wait to see what shenanigans Stickland pulls today.

AJSully421 wrote:Can't wait to see what shenanigans Stickland pulls today.

He's like the court jester or the comedic relief in a tv drama

HB910 status says 4/20 bill read 3rd time/postponed. Bill Failed to pass the House.

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... 10#vote377" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

?????????? Is it dead? Did I miss anything?????????

LSUTiger wrote:HB910 status says 4/20 bill read 3rd time/postponed. Bill Failed to pass the House.

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... 10#vote377" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

?????????? Is it dead? Did I miss anything?????????

Coming up later today, must be a glitch.

TVGuy wrote:

LSUTiger wrote:HB910 status says 4/20 bill read 3rd time/postponed. Bill Failed to pass the House.

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... 10#vote377" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

?????????? Is it dead? Did I miss anything?????????

Coming up later today, must be a glitch.

Bill hasn't failed the House by any means. Author of the bill requested postponement on voting on the bill to work out some details on an amendment. They are SUPPOSED to get to it today. I'm having my doubts they will have time. But wut does i know?

joe817 wrote:

TVGuy wrote:

LSUTiger wrote:HB910 status says 4/20 bill read 3rd time/postponed. Bill Failed to pass the House.

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... 10#vote377" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

?????????? Is it dead? Did I miss anything?????????

Coming up later today, must be a glitch.

Bill hasn't failed the House by any means. Author of the bill requested postponement on voting on the bill to work out some details on an amendment. They are SUPPOSED to get to it today. I'm having my doubts they will have time. But wut does i know?

I believe 1690's author is closing now and it's the last item on the calendar. We could be up next w/ 910

TVGuy wrote:

joe817 wrote:

TVGuy wrote:

LSUTiger wrote:HB910 status says 4/20 bill read 3rd time/postponed. Bill Failed to pass the House.

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... 10#vote377" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

?????????? Is it dead? Did I miss anything?????????

Coming up later today, must be a glitch.

Bill hasn't failed the House by any means. Author of the bill requested postponement on voting on the bill to work out some details on an amendment. They are SUPPOSED to get to it today. I'm having my doubts they will have time. But wut does i know?

I believe 1690's author is closing now and it's the last item on the calendar. We could be up next w/ 910

There was one other bill that requested to be held until later today.

third reading, here we go!

It just now came up! First working on a "perfection" of the amendment that passed on Friday