TexasCHLforum.com

SewTexas wrote:toasting marshmallows? dang, scoot over and make room. I'll bring the graham crackers.

notice I stepped out of the argument back in page 3, I'm learning

I'm can hardly wait for EEllis to meet Jared1981!

SewTexas wrote:toasting marshmallows? dang, scoot over and make room. I'll bring the graham crackers.

notice I stepped out of the argument back in page 3, I'm learning

One day I'll catch on. Hopefully soon.

I'd be more upset about not getting the ammo back. That looks like a Taurus PT-22. You can get them anywhere...the ammo, you can't. And if you can, it costs darn near as much as the gun...

Seems like everybody has calmed a bit ... Does anyone know if internal investigations are ever made public? We had to wait 9 months, and after a grand jury, to hear what the Police found during the Waller case in FTW. Obviously this incident isn't as serious, but the investigation may never be made public. But, is anyone optimistic that we'll know what, if anything, happened here? I don't think we'll find out. The less the public knows, especially in an example like this, the better. That's Government 101.

EEllis wrote:First can only arrest a person not a car.

Likewise, one can only unlawfully restrain a person not a car.

polly wrote:

EEllis wrote:First can only arrest a person not a car.

Likewise, one can only unlawfully restrain a person not a car.

A car can be unlawfully impounded.

WildBill wrote:

polly wrote:

EEllis wrote:First can only arrest a person not a car.

Likewise, one can only unlawfully restrain a person not a car.

A car can be unlawfully impounded.

Did the lady impound their car?

mojo84 wrote:

WildBill wrote:

polly wrote:

EEllis wrote:First can only arrest a person not a car.

Likewise, one can only unlawfully restrain a person not a car.

A car can be unlawfully impounded.

Did the lady impound their car?

I don't think so.

WildBill wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

WildBill wrote:

polly wrote:

EEllis wrote:First can only arrest a person not a car.

Likewise, one can only unlawfully restrain a person not a car.

A car can be unlawfully impounded.

Did the lady impound their car?

I don't think so.

Your comment has me .

polly wrote:

EEllis wrote:First can only arrest a person not a car.

Likewise, one can only unlawfully restrain a person not a car.

If you block the vehicle are you not restraining the movement of the passengers? Mind you it really matters little what charge could be applied. They could just do a disorderly conduct charge if they felt like it.

baseballguy2001 wrote:Seems like everybody has calmed a bit ... Does anyone know if internal investigations are ever made public? We had to wait 9 months, and after a grand jury, to hear what the Police found during the Waller case in FTW. Obviously this incident isn't as serious, but the investigation may never be made public. But, is anyone optimistic that we'll know what, if anything, happened here? I don't think we'll find out. The less the public knows, especially in an example like this, the better. That's Government 101.

Approximately 75 of Mr. Waller's neighbors held a candlelight vigil at his house this week on the anniversary of his wrongful death. According to the WFAA reporter on the scene, most of his neighbors said they believe the officers involved lied, in their sworn statements, about what really happened to protect themselves, and since they were the only witnesses, they avoided any criminal charges. The FWPD's lack of transparency in the handling of the investigation and the long delay in releasing their findings just further erodes the public's faith and trust in the Police Department.

talltex wrote:

baseballguy2001 wrote:Seems like everybody has calmed a bit ... Does anyone know if internal investigations are ever made public? We had to wait 9 months, and after a grand jury, to hear what the Police found during the Waller case in FTW. Obviously this incident isn't as serious, but the investigation may never be made public. But, is anyone optimistic that we'll know what, if anything, happened here? I don't think we'll find out. The less the public knows, especially in an example like this, the better. That's Government 101.

Approximately 75 of Mr. Waller's neighbors held a candlelight vigil at his house this week on the anniversary of his wrongful death. According to the WFAA reporter on the scene, most of his neighbors said they believe the officers involved lied, in their sworn statements, about what really happened to protect themselves, and since they were the only witnesses, they avoided any criminal charges. The FWPD's lack of transparency in the handling of the investigation and the long delay in releasing their findings just further erodes the public's faith and trust in the Police Department.

Get back on topic for this subject.

Once again, cameras would have resolved this issue quickly.... And protected those officers that didn't do anything wrong.

cb1000rider wrote:Once again, cameras would have resolved this issue quickly.... And protected those officers that didn't do anything wrong.