TexasCHLforum.com

I had two impressions during the debate. 1st, Hillary may be the best liar I have ever seen. She has done it so much that it doesn't set off any of the normal tells. 2nd, she wore an earpiece. Most of her lies didn't even come from her own mind. She was just regurgitating what her handlers told her to say. It's bad enough to be a pathological liar, it's even worse to pay people to help you come up the the lies.

Lynyrd wrote:I had two impressions during the debate. 1st, Hillary may be the best liar I have ever seen. She has done it so much that it doesn't set off any of the normal tells. 2nd, she wore an earpiece. Most of her lies didn't even come from her own mind. She was just regurgitating what her handlers told her to say. It's bad enough to be a pathological liar, it's even worse to pay people to help you come up the the lies.

I didn't watch the show, but I have seen a photo of her with the earpiece. In the photo, she is wearing a different necklace, earrings, and perhaps a different red Chairman Mao suit.

What made you think she was wearing an earpiece?

JALLEN wrote:

Lynyrd wrote:I had two impressions during the debate. 1st, Hillary may be the best liar I have ever seen. She has done it so much that it doesn't set off any of the normal tells. 2nd, she wore an earpiece. Most of her lies didn't even come from her own mind. She was just regurgitating what her handlers told her to say. It's bad enough to be a pathological liar, it's even worse to pay people to help you come up the the lies.

I didn't watch the show, but I have seen a photo of her with the earpiece. In the photo, she is wearing a different necklace, earrings, and perhaps a different red Chairman Mao suit.

What made you think she was wearing an earpiece?

The expressions on her face while Trump was talking was what convinced me. Sometimes it sure didn't look like she wasn't listening to Trump, it looked like she was listening to something else. And sometimes she would have this blank expression that all of a sudden changed to a big smile when she realized what she was going to say next. Those changes in her facial appearance from listening to smiling did not correspond with what Trump was saying at the time. The timing was off.

bblhd672 wrote:

CAN NOT UNSEE

This is "trigger warning" worthy. I'm just trying to decide whether you committed and micro or macro aggression. Either way, I'm offended.

bblhd672 wrote:

Lynyrd wrote: The expressions on her face while Trump was talking was what convinced me. Sometimes it sure didn't look like she wasn't listening to Trump, it looked like she was listening to something else. And sometimes she would have this blank expression that all of a sudden changed to a big smile when she realized what she was going to say next. Those changes in her facial appearance from listening to smiling did not correspond with what Trump was saying at the time. The timing was off.

Wow, I can't imagine what it must take to be able to listen to two speakers at once and still provide timely replies. Hard to believe... she must be smarter than I thought!

I still wouldn't vote for her though.

Anyway, see http://www.snopes.com/clinton-secret-earpiece-debate/

Never mind.

dale blanker wrote: Wow, I can't imagine what it must take to be able to listen to two speakers at once and still provide timely replies. Hard to believe... she must be smarter than I thought!

Every reporter does that all the time. The control room speaks in their ear piece. Hard to do...., think not.

JALLEN wrote:Never mind.

Impressive. I can never resist the urge to scratch at a chigger bite

dale blanker wrote:
I still wouldn't vote for her though.

Anyway, see http://www.snopes.com/clinton-secret-earpiece-debate/

You might want to check into Snopes before you swallow everything they have to say.

http://www.thefirearmsforum.com/threads ... pes.64565/

Bitter Clinger wrote:

JALLEN wrote:Never mind.

Impressive. I can never resist the urge to scratch at a chigger bite

I misunderstood what he read.

AFAIK, there is no way to delete something once posted, so I edited it out to spare consternation to all concerned.

CLINTON RECEIVED DEBATE QUESTIONS WEEK BEFORE DEBATE, ACCORDING TO SOURCES

http://baltimoregazette.com/clinton-rec ... ek-debate/

Hardly surprising. If you don't care enough to cheat, you don't care enough to win!

JALLEN wrote:CLINTON RECEIVED DEBATE QUESTIONS WEEK BEFORE DEBATE, ACCORDING TO SOURCES

http://baltimoregazette.com/clinton-rec ... ek-debate/

Hardly surprising. If you don't care enough to cheat, you don't care enough to win!

Has then been substantiated or verified by anyone? I'm just not familiar with that publication and am not sure how credible this story is. However, I would not be surprised if it happened.

Things are bizarre enough without promoting false claims.