Re: SB11 & HB910 This week....
Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 2:23 pm
HB910 Senate Amendments Analysis distributed.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Does that now make it eligible for consideration or does it have to be distributed for a period of time?CJD wrote:HB910 Senate Amendments Analysis distributed.
I think someone alluded to a 24 hour period, and it being on a calendar. And not that I know of.TXBO wrote:Does that now make it eligible for consideration or does it have to be distributed for a period of time?CJD wrote:HB910 Senate Amendments Analysis distributed.
Is there somewhere that we can read the analysis?
My understanding is that it should show up on the "Items to be Considered" Calendar when it is eligible. It's not there for today.CJD wrote:I think someone alluded to a 24 hour period, and it being on a calendar. And not that I know of.TXBO wrote:Does that now make it eligible for consideration or does it have to be distributed for a period of time?CJD wrote:HB910 Senate Amendments Analysis distributed.
Is there somewhere that we can read the analysis?
EDIT: I lied, you can view it here:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... Bill=HB910" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Thanks a million.CJD wrote:I think someone alluded to a 24 hour period, and it being on a calendar. And not that I know of.TXBO wrote:Does that now make it eligible for consideration or does it have to be distributed for a period of time?CJD wrote:HB910 Senate Amendments Analysis distributed.
Is there somewhere that we can read the analysis?
EDIT: I lied, you can view it here:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... Bill=HB910" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Wow, MRS. Tripp called it "significantly similar". I'd call it remarkably similar. What a shame it wasn't identical language.CJD wrote:I think someone alluded to a 24 hour period, and it being on a calendar. And not that I know of.TXBO wrote:Does that now make it eligible for consideration or does it have to be distributed for a period of time?CJD wrote:HB910 Senate Amendments Analysis distributed.
Is there somewhere that we can read the analysis?
EDIT: I lied, you can view it here:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... Bill=HB910" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It will if you have a CHL. Otherwise there will be no change in the MPA.rp_photo wrote:Will Open Carry loosen the requirements to keep weapons out of sight inside vehicles?
And it also must be in a belt or shoulder holster.rp_photo wrote:Will Open Carry loosen the requirements to keep weapons out of sight inside vehicles?
It will allow the weapon to be in sight in a shoulder or belt holster of a CHL holder, but not loose on the seat, tucked in the seat, attached to a holster on the steering column, etc. .louisf1 wrote:It will if you have a CHL. Otherwise there will be no change in the MPA.rp_photo wrote:Will Open Carry loosen the requirements to keep weapons out of sight inside vehicles?
Layman's Opinion >> If you have a CHL, and gun is in a shoulder or belt holster a licensee should be able to open carry in their car as well as outside their car I'd imagine (That's why I'd prefer "in a holster" for a holster fastened to the steering column/transmission hump...instead of Belt or Shoulder holster ... but that's what the 86th session may be for?)rp_photo wrote:Will Open Carry loosen the requirements to keep weapons out of sight inside vehicles?
The latter.mojo84 wrote:Has Sen. Huffman made any public statements about her reasoning or justification for her amendment increasing the charge of not having the chl with you to a felony? Was her intent to make it a felony if someone just forgot their valid CHL at home or was she targeting those that may try to open carry without having applied and received a CHL?
I think there is an important distinction there.