Page 1 of 1
PM9/40 Poll
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:50 pm
by Keith B
OK, I bit the bullet (pun intended
)and spent the extra money on a PM9 over the PF-9. Haven't been to the range yet, so can't share my experiences yet.
I want feedback from you PM9 or PM40 owners on your experiences.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:25 pm
by Mike1951
I would expect them to have the bugs worked out by now.
I bought mine in Aug 2002. They refused to acknowledge there was a feeding problem early on so I worked on it some myself.
Later on, they asked for a return of the barrels so they could recontour the feed ramps.
Then later still, they had a full blown barrel recall where they replaced the barrels.
That's been a few years now and mine works ok.
Now if they will just figure out the problem with my already replaced P45!
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:54 pm
by Bashful
I've have both the PM9 and P9, and they have been flawless out of the box.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:07 pm
by Velocity
Well, I'm in the "Sent it back to Kahr and they fixed it" (twice) category.
Here's my story (I use the username "Hawkes" over at GlockTalk) :
http://www.glocktalk.com/showthread.php ... did=674143
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:19 am
by phddan
Can't talk about the PM-9, but the P-9 I got had two FTF's in the first 20 rnds, and not a problem since, and I have about 1500 rnds through it now.
Dan
PM9
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:07 am
by USMC-COL
I've had two. Got rid of both. Will never own another at any price. Gun was finicky. Mags were finicky. Did not feed everything - even FMJ after suitable break-in period. It was a great pocket gun with good sights and decent accuracy, but the detractors were too much for me. QC is questionable. Slide release was horrible - especially at speed. Bled a lot from thumb.
Bottom line, it dropped in my pocket and became invisible, but I could not trust my life to it.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:24 pm
by RPBrown
Had a PM40. Won't own another. Sent to factory several times and still not reliable. Too bad as it was a perfect size for pocket carry.
I hope they got the QC up and failures down. Hate to see someone depend on it and it not go bang.
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:17 pm
by gamboolman
I bought a new PM-9 last year. After much money, time, shipping it back to Kahr to work on and send back still not working good. Lots of aggravation - Kahr gave me a full refund. I have been flamed for posting my experience on other sites - but it is all true.
I have a Glock 26 now and have bought my wife a Glock 26.
I recommend Glocks - they function and eat anything - I walk/jog about 6 miles a day in Houston - lots of sweat and rain and the Glocks function.
I wish you the best with your PM-9.
I CCW for myself and my families protection - I would recommend you get a Glock.
Thanks, gamboolman.....
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 5:31 pm
by Reeves
I bought a PM9 in March. Took it straight home and fired some rds. Had 2 FTF in the 1st 2 mags. Cleaned it and no more problems since. About 700 rds through it.
Then I bought a PM40 last month. Cleaned it and have not had a single problem. Have about 300 through the 40.