Page 1 of 1

Re: Striker fired vs Hammer fired(?)

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:33 pm
by Liko81
Hammer-fired weapons are no more or less safe than striker fired. It could be argued that they're less safe because the hammer can catch on something, and it can also be argued they're more safe because even though "safe-actions" have a trigger catch, a DA pull is harder and therefore even less likely to be negligently pulled. In the end though, any gun of any type currently in production is safe, even if in Condition Zero, as long as Rule 1 is followed. There is no excuse not to follow Rule 1. Safeties are exactly that; they're a safety net that helps protect you and those around you if you do something unsafe such as drop the weapon.

It is true that striker-fired weapons are more "streamlined", for lack of a better word. That makes them easier to draw from concealment. That does not mean hammer-fired weapons are significantly harder to draw. Despite all the striker-fired designs available, 1911s and .38 snubbys are still the most popular CCWs. Glocks are great duty weapons and the 26 is the "pocket rocket" for a reason, but other than the subcompacts they conceal kinda like my Ruger P95 does (as in there are better options). Ruger's new SR9 is slim, but it's still a full-size wonder-nine. Same with the M&Ps. All-in-all I don't think you'll have much trouble with either hammered or striker-fired in terms of carry safety, AS LONG AS YOU FOLLOW THE 4 RULES! :cool:

Re: Striker fired vs Hammer fired(?)

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:17 pm
by rm9792
There are also hammer fired without an exposed hammer, such as the Para LDA.

Re: Striker fired vs Hammer fired(?)

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:30 pm
by flintknapper
Some striker fired weapons offer "second strike" capability, a feature that could be an advantage in the (rare) case of a round not going off.

I suspect certain striker fired weapons have a faster "lock time" than some hammer fired ones, it never hurts to be faster. ;-)

Re: Striker fired vs Hammer fired(?)

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:34 pm
by flintknapper
rm9792 wrote:There are also hammer fired without an exposed hammer, such as the Para LDA.

The LDA does have an "exposed" hammer, but it is always in the down position until the trigger is pulled. The newer models have what is basically a "bobbed" hammer...and it is hardly even noticeable when at rest.

I apologize if this sounds like a "correction", I knew what you meant, but the distinction is an important one.

Re: Striker fired vs Hammer fired(?)

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:54 pm
by rm9792
My mistake, I meant the bobbed one. Kimber RCP is that way as well.