TexasCHLforum.com

Discussed here:

http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... ul#p161006

Post 1986 so not allowed.

Very similar to the ARES FMG designed by Eugene Stoner in the 80's.

boomerang wrote:Post 1986 so not allowed.

What?
It's a semi-auto GLOCK handgun with a butt stock.
And, when closed, its concealed.
Why would this not be allowed???
Would this actually be considered a "rifle" by the suits in Austin?
Simply for the stock???
That makes little sense...


EDIT: Looking again, I noticed the elongated barrel.
Still, its a GLOCK. And IIRC, GLOCK doesn't make rifles.

Nope, it's full auto built around a Glock.

He says its a machine gun and then talks about the auto sear.

No, actually he said it "has an area to allow an auto sear". Just like any GLOCK.

I stand corrected.

However, due to the shoulder stock, it would still be a SBR.

kauboy wrote:Would this actually be considered a "rifle" by the suits in Austin?

I don't know about the rest of the suits in Austin, but in my office we showed this to the Chief and requested he buy some. Of course, we told him we had a flashlight he should consider since we are examining a few new flashlights right now anyway.

BTW, his answer was that we were supposed to be looking at smaller flashlights, like Stingers.

I think this "prototype" is ingenius...

Sure, it can be brought up to the shoulder like a rifle, but it is concealed until it is "deployed" in a self-defense situation...

See, when the gun control crowd gets all up in a tissy about things like this, and does what they can to demonize, and try to ban its production and sale to the public, you just have to know someone has done something very clever, and right for a change...

Mike1951 wrote:I stand corrected.

However, due to the shoulder stock, it would still be a SBR.

SBR = Price of the box, price of a Glock + $200 tax stamp and a buncha paperwork

Thank God we live in Texas where we can still get stuff like this