smyrna wrote:Suppose a business properly posts a 30.06 on the front door to its building (and all entrances to the building for that matter), is the 30.06 enforceable on the parking lot? Or, is this a uniquely different case from posting a valid 30.06 at the entrance to the property? How is the CHL holder suppose to distiguish where a property, as far as the 30.06 notice, begins or ends?
For example, occasionaly someone will mention a bank being 30.06 and others will reply to just use the drive through. Well, if an enitre property can be posted, suppose a bank posted at the drive entrance, then by the above logic, the drive through would then become off limits as well, or not?
In my personal opinion (IANAL, etc.), posting at the entrances of a building applies only to the building, not the grounds.
I have never seen a 30.06-posted parking lot, but I have heard rumors of them. Again IMHO, that would apply to the point where the sign was posted and beyond.
No private property owner can search your vehicle without your permission, and they must allow you to leave if you do not give permission.
The police need probable cause to search a vehicle,and they don't often have it on private property.
llwatson wrote:Just to clarify 30.06... this only applies to carrying a handgun on or about your person, as defined in Subchapter H, Chapter 411
It does NOT mean you cannot leave a firearm locked in your vehicle. So, even if a parking lot is posted, you are not prevented from leaving the handgun in your car.
As long as it is not accessible to you, it is not "on or about your person".
I respect your opinion, as you have more experience and training than I do.
I'm wondering, though, if the gate of a parking lot is posted, whether someone who enters with a handgun in the passenger compartment of a vehicle is carying on or about his person at that point.
I agree with Jim Longley on this.
txmatt wrote:I really wouldn't want to have to find out the hard way, but if a parking lot is posted 30.06, doesn't that only prohibit carrying a concealed handgun under the authority of a CHL? So... if it never leaves your car couldn't one argue that you are carrying as allowed by 46.02? Seems wrong that only permit holders are banned from leaving their handguns in their car while people engaged in legal unliscensed car carry are not.
The lege made something of a mess with this.
For over a hundred years, the only legal way to have a handgun on or about your person in public was if you were traveling. In that case, any generic "no guns" sign or oral notification was valid.
Then came CHL, and later 30.06. It was still illegal for almost everyone else to have a handgun in public.
When they made it legal for nearly everyone to have a concealed handgun in their vehicle, they did not consider the gap between 30.05 and 30.06.
I don't want to be a test case on this issue. No one does.
- Jim