Para carry failure to feed issues
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 11:36 pm
I have had failure to feed problems with my Para 6.45 LDA. What happens is that the round gets hung up on the feed ramp. Rapping the back of the slide would usually drive it forward and into battery. Given the ramped barrel design, this is the last thing I would expect from any Para. But as the saying goes, "it is what it is".
While experimenting to identify the cause, I found that I could get good feeding using my Wilson Combat magazines instead of the ones that Para supplies. The only problem is that the Wilson mags are somewhat longer than the compact style grip frame of the Para, so they would stick out past the grip frame by quite a bit.
For the heck of it, I tried swapping the Wilson springs and followers into the Para mags. (The Wilson followers are shaped a little differently than the Paras.) With the Wilson parts, feeding was flawless. So, figuring the problem was solved, I ordered some Wilson springs and followers and installed them in my Para mags.
With this setup, I got through an IDPA match with no problems. So I figured I was good to go.
Lucky for me, I had read a lot of stuff on the Para Forum about the alleged short service life of the recoil spring assembly of the 6.45 LDA. I have chatted with Para's Service Dept. about this, and they said the assembly should be replaced every 1000 rounds or so. So I ordered one from Brownell's right away. It was back ordered and took about 4 weeks to come through.
So it was sitting in my gun box when, at Saturday's IDPA match, the failure to feed problems resurfaced.
Needless to say, on the way home form the match my Commander was pressed into service as my carry gun. Luckily, it fits the Galco Royal Guard holster I use for the Para just fine. (The end of the barrel sticks out [abbreviated profanity deleted] the holster a bit, but not enough to make me buy another one.)
Today, I field stripped and cleaned the Para. When I went to install the new recoil spring assembly, I noticed two things right away.
1) The main spring on the new assembly was about 1/2 inch longer than on the old one.
2) The new spring was much, much stronger than the old one. I could barely get it installed. And after the gun was re-assembled, it took much more effort to cycle the slide.
I suspect that the new spring has enough "oomph" to overcome rounds sticking on the feed ramp. But I won't know for sure until I put some rounds through it.
Now I am curious as to whether my old spring was shorter and weaker because it was worn out, or if Para has upgraded the springs they supply now to eliminate failures to feed.
I noticed today that Brownell's now stocks replacement springs as seperate pieces. (No need to buy the whole assembly.) So I bought 3 of them. With two assemblies, I can always have a fresh one for carry and use the other one for practice and competition.
Anyone else have any experiences along these lines?
While experimenting to identify the cause, I found that I could get good feeding using my Wilson Combat magazines instead of the ones that Para supplies. The only problem is that the Wilson mags are somewhat longer than the compact style grip frame of the Para, so they would stick out past the grip frame by quite a bit.
For the heck of it, I tried swapping the Wilson springs and followers into the Para mags. (The Wilson followers are shaped a little differently than the Paras.) With the Wilson parts, feeding was flawless. So, figuring the problem was solved, I ordered some Wilson springs and followers and installed them in my Para mags.
With this setup, I got through an IDPA match with no problems. So I figured I was good to go.
Lucky for me, I had read a lot of stuff on the Para Forum about the alleged short service life of the recoil spring assembly of the 6.45 LDA. I have chatted with Para's Service Dept. about this, and they said the assembly should be replaced every 1000 rounds or so. So I ordered one from Brownell's right away. It was back ordered and took about 4 weeks to come through.
So it was sitting in my gun box when, at Saturday's IDPA match, the failure to feed problems resurfaced.
Needless to say, on the way home form the match my Commander was pressed into service as my carry gun. Luckily, it fits the Galco Royal Guard holster I use for the Para just fine. (The end of the barrel sticks out [abbreviated profanity deleted] the holster a bit, but not enough to make me buy another one.)
Today, I field stripped and cleaned the Para. When I went to install the new recoil spring assembly, I noticed two things right away.
1) The main spring on the new assembly was about 1/2 inch longer than on the old one.
2) The new spring was much, much stronger than the old one. I could barely get it installed. And after the gun was re-assembled, it took much more effort to cycle the slide.
I suspect that the new spring has enough "oomph" to overcome rounds sticking on the feed ramp. But I won't know for sure until I put some rounds through it.
Now I am curious as to whether my old spring was shorter and weaker because it was worn out, or if Para has upgraded the springs they supply now to eliminate failures to feed.
I noticed today that Brownell's now stocks replacement springs as seperate pieces. (No need to buy the whole assembly.) So I bought 3 of them. With two assemblies, I can always have a fresh one for carry and use the other one for practice and competition.
Anyone else have any experiences along these lines?