TexasCHLforum.com

No longer valid

Yah...call it the "Do not rob list"

It wouldn't fly...they want to "control" us....not actually share in the responsibility

Gun CONTROL has NOTHING to do with firearm safety or protection for children or even trying to remove firearms from criminals..its just about CONTROL...period!

No longer valid

No, no, no, no, the sign should say "I don't like guns, I won't defend myself, I give up easily, I will give you what you want without a fight".


I also agree that anti's should have their name and address published for the public good. That way the criminals will know where they can go without the fear of being shot/killed. They should also list what time they leave for work and return from work, also they have to call home and leave a message on the answering machine telling the criminal that they are on their way home early or if they will be home late.

If they believed their propoganda they would proudly advertise they don't carry and have no guns in their homes.

They would also get a court injunction against armed men (security, police, etc.) to come to their rescue.

Believe or not. when i tried this tactics, the antis got reallllllly irritated at me.

Believe there was a city in the Northeast a few years ago where a group of homeowners posted signs in their yards pronouncing their home was "gun free"....As I best recall, that lasted only a short period of time before the signs came down after an increase in crime......

I guess we'll see what happens. If Obama disarms the Secret Service we'll know he's anti gun. On the other hand, if he allows the Secret Service to carry guns to protect him then he's openly admitting that more guns = less crime. Actions speak louder than words.

I wish that is how everyone else would see it. He doesnt have to ban guns he just has to tax them and make it too expensive to own and shoot.