Page 1 of 1

Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:36 pm
by cowboymd
Obama has started his support for murdering babies, can the start of his gun controll be far behind.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N23463777.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

If this is improper, delete it.

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:37 pm
by Captain Matt
I don't see the connection. Even the GOP didn't support selling guns to children.

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:34 pm
by nitrogen
cowboymd wrote:Obama has started his support for murdering babies, can the start of his gun controll be far behind.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N23463777.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

If this is improper, delete it.
Abortion != Gun Control.

Actually, in my eyes, it kind of does.

There are some of us that support the right of people to make choices that we personally find morally repugnant. It's what Freedom means, at any rate.

I might as well explain it now as I know it'll come up.
Most Jews believe that a baby is not fully a human until it takes it's first breath; a belief I share. Not that I'm a fan of abortion; I do find it morally repugnant, but I will support people's ability to make choices that I may not agree with.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/jud_abor.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.jewfaq.org/sex.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:36 pm
by anygunanywhere
Obviously the babies born months before their full term date and live would argue that point when they reach adulthood. I am one of them. Being an ex-fetus I am vehemently opposed to abortion.

Anygunanywhere

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:36 pm
by Oldgringo
Since the abortion question has been raised:

Abortion is a personal matter between the parties and is no one else's business; certainly, not the government's. There are those who say abortion is contrary to God's will and perhaps it is. If that's the case, abortion is a personal matter between the parties and their God. The state still has no business in this very private matter.

The above having been said does not make me a proponent of abortion any more than it makes me a democrat. It is simply a matter of separation of church and state.

I believe the original post concerned gun control?

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:39 pm
by bayouhazard
cowboymd wrote:Obama has started his support for murdering babies, can the start of his gun controll be far behind.
I think it's scheduled for the week before mandatory conversion to Islam. Or maybe the week after. I can't keep track of all the internet theories. :willynilly:

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:20 pm
by anygunanywhere
Oldgringo wrote:
I believe the original post concerned gun control?
The OP brought up killing babies and gun control. I have read in the constitution about the RKBA. I am still looking for the article that enumerates the right to kill the unborn. It isn't there. SCOTUS was wrong in Roe too, just like in Heller where the 5 ruled that your RKBA could be infringed some more and the 4 ruled that you had the right to be in the militia.

Anygunanywhere

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:09 am
by cowboymd
My OP was to point out that instead of being the “One” that they voted in to save the country, some of his first actions were to promote his and the Democratic agenda. Starting with promoting abortion, so does that mean gun control could be next? That was just my observation.

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:17 am
by boomerang
cowboymd wrote:My OP was to point out that instead of being the “One” that they voted in to save the country, some of his first actions were to promote his and the Democratic agenda. Starting with promoting abortion, so does that mean gun control could be next? That was just my observation.
You realize the policy only affects groups that provide those services in other countries, not in the USA. Right?

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:50 am
by nitrogen
cowboymd wrote:My OP was to point out that instead of being the “One” that they voted in to save the country, some of his first actions were to promote his and the Democratic agenda. Starting with promoting abortion, so does that mean gun control could be next? That was just my observation.
This back and fourth is nothing new. Reagan originally posted the funding ban, then Clinton recinded it, then GWB reinstated it, and now Obama recinded it again. It's really nothing new.

Re: Obama: Can Gun Controll Be Far Behind

Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:54 am
by CopOnce
anygunanywhere wrote:Obviously the babies born months before their full term date and live would argue that point when they reach adulthood. I am one of them. Being an ex-fetus I am vehemently opposed to abortion.

Anygunanywhere
Amen!!!