It's a matter of Priorities
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:02 pm
Hi Everyone,
I'm new to the forum and lurked for awhile before posting. I gotta say, I've learned allot here in very little time. There are many smart and well informed people on this forum.
I especially enjoy Mr. Rothstein's perspectives.
I want to throw out a story and some thoughts that reflect the current state of the CHL wait time as I see it.
I hope this doesn't sound too much like the rant it's supposed to be.
GrannyGun and I just recently moved to Texas (Dec. 08)
I did not have my CHL in the previous homestead, but that's one of the first things I am doing here.
GrannyGun came home today and told me something that got me thinking and I thought I'd pass it along.
GrannyGun is getting her teaching license here. She took her final state exams last Friday (2-20) and got her results today (2-23)!!!
She said everyone who worked for the company handling the exams was courteous and helpful and did everything they could to get the test started and completed on time.
She will have her license shortly.
Now, this gets my blood boiling because some who say they have a clean record on this site have waited almost a year for their plastic.
I will grant that taking an exam and grading it is allot easier than performing background checks and depending on others outside of DPS's control to get what is needed back to them.
However, I believe the major difference in how quickly the results are obtained is that teacher exams are handled by a private, for profit, company.
Maybe the state should contract the whole process out. Perhaps this would speed things up if the contractor did not get paid until an application was processed.
This indicates to me where the State's priorities lie. Yes, teachers are VERY important. Yes CHL holders are VERY important. But the fact two Very important license types are handled so differently and that CHL licenses take so long tells me that the State has not yet prioritized CHL licensing as it should.
It seems to me that a private company could handle the application process more efficiently and more consistently than the State (as is ALWAYS the case IMHO).
Just my $0.02 anyway.
What do yall think?
I'm new to the forum and lurked for awhile before posting. I gotta say, I've learned allot here in very little time. There are many smart and well informed people on this forum.
I especially enjoy Mr. Rothstein's perspectives.
I want to throw out a story and some thoughts that reflect the current state of the CHL wait time as I see it.
I hope this doesn't sound too much like the rant it's supposed to be.

GrannyGun and I just recently moved to Texas (Dec. 08)
I did not have my CHL in the previous homestead, but that's one of the first things I am doing here.
GrannyGun came home today and told me something that got me thinking and I thought I'd pass it along.
GrannyGun is getting her teaching license here. She took her final state exams last Friday (2-20) and got her results today (2-23)!!!
She said everyone who worked for the company handling the exams was courteous and helpful and did everything they could to get the test started and completed on time.
She will have her license shortly.
Now, this gets my blood boiling because some who say they have a clean record on this site have waited almost a year for their plastic.
I will grant that taking an exam and grading it is allot easier than performing background checks and depending on others outside of DPS's control to get what is needed back to them.
However, I believe the major difference in how quickly the results are obtained is that teacher exams are handled by a private, for profit, company.
Maybe the state should contract the whole process out. Perhaps this would speed things up if the contractor did not get paid until an application was processed.
This indicates to me where the State's priorities lie. Yes, teachers are VERY important. Yes CHL holders are VERY important. But the fact two Very important license types are handled so differently and that CHL licenses take so long tells me that the State has not yet prioritized CHL licensing as it should.
It seems to me that a private company could handle the application process more efficiently and more consistently than the State (as is ALWAYS the case IMHO).
Just my $0.02 anyway.
What do yall think?