Page 1 of 1

Constipated Thinking In Arizona

Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:58 pm
by casingpoint
The National Academy of Sciences reviewed hundreds of studies and found not "a single gun regulation that reduced violent crime or murder."
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/ ... ome_g.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Constipated Thinking In Arizona

Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:41 pm
by casingpoint
For those interested
Not a lot of that for this thread. Just another bum post headed for the IN basket of obscurity in cyberspace. Thanks anyway for the boost, andy.

Re: Constipated Thinking In Arizona

Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:47 pm
by joe817
casingpoint wrote:
For those interested
Not a lot of that for this thread. Just another bum post headed for the IN basket of obscurity in cyberspace. Thanks anyway for the boost, andy.
Hold your horses cyberboy! :lol: Casingpoint I'm reading on it. Thanks for posting.

Thanks Andy for posting that. I got up to page 26, and had to quit. It's quite a scholarly work, and some of it's not easy reading for these tired old eyes. Kinda like Texas gun laws. But I find it interesting.

Casingpoint, remember a whole lot of folks are at the annual TSRA Convention Dinner tonight in Mesquite. I wish them well, and I wish I could have made it.

I imagine that your thread will get its fair share of reading and then some.

Re: Constipated Thinking In Arizona

Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:52 pm
by chartreuse
AndyC wrote:For those interested, here it is
Thanks, Andy. I had a quick look for it, but failed to find it.

Re: Constipated Thinking In Arizona

Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:03 pm
by casingpoint
It's quite a scholarly work, and some of it's not easy reading for these tired old eyes
Yes, it's quite a piece. With a very interesting examination of infringement/regulations and judicial scrutiny beginning on page 292. It outlines a real-life Catch 22. :evil2:

In this article, SCOTUS is predestined to evaluate the Second Amendment in the MacDonald case as a fundamental right subject to strict scrutiny. States will then have to document that individual firearms restrictions actually further a valid governmental interest. :headscratch

But despite all the studies to date, remains no demonstrated link between gun restriction and gun crime. :smilelol5:

In fact, just the opposite is held:
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/493636.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Many thanks again to Andy for posting the link.