As far as "private property" versus "public place" I read of a Disorderly Conduct conviction of a man
on his porch waiving a shotgun around recklessly or in a manner calculated to cause alarm who was viewable to the public,
was in a public place ... (he wasn't doing yardwork)
For the last year or two I open carry while doing yardwork etc, but I wouldn't if I lived where I used to.
Now I'm in the city, a small town of about 2,500 people (a "few" CHLs probably, I know 4 or 5 just in my very small home church, ... 2009 statistics (2010 are many more) County Population: 34147
Licenses: 356
Licenses % of State: 0.26%
Total Licenses Rank: 65)
and all the neighbors have known me for years.
Other "Problems" you can have if you open carry in the yard, even with neighbors who accept it, are:
Neighbor motions for you to come across the street, he wants to tell you something ... do you
1) cover it and be sure you have your CHL with you while crossing the street?
2) pitch the pistol in a hidden location on your property so you can run across the street and back real fast (If night comes and you notice an empty holster, run look where you hid it?) { I'll never do that again, good thing it wasn't garbage day !!!]
3) after wearing it open/shirtless all day , is it now "concealed" after covering with a Tee-shirt or paper towel?
(3) "Concealed handgun" means a handgun, the presence
of which is not openly discernible to the ordinary observation of a
reasonable person, who has been looking at it all day prior to your draping a garbage bag/towel etc over your pistol, holster and hip?
4) How about that city easement out by the street where you may or may not have a sidewalk?
Do I need to disarm, or conceal to cross it and get my mail from my mailbox at the street?
(don't walk through where the easement crosses your driveway?)
I carry IWB in a proper holster, never unholstering nor waiving it around, shirtless doing yardwork.
(My new weedeater gets more attention than my Glock)
A lot probably depends on where you live and your neighbors perception of you, and the perception of those who might drive by. I
may have (not admitting anything, purely hypothetical) once while getting my mail out of my mailbox on my property with at least one foot on my property, accidentally set my other foot in the street ... thankfully no neighbor called 911 and no SWAT team arrived .... Your Mileage May Vary, depending on many factors.
Keeping in mind that
your front yard can be considered "a public place" though "private property"
Disorderly Conduct can cost you your CHL
Just a few excerpts I selected from:
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/d ... /PE.42.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(but the link is so you can read more)
PENAL CODE
TITLE 9. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER AND DECENCY
CHAPTER 42. DISORDERLY CONDUCT AND RELATED OFFENSES
Sec. 42.01. DISORDERLY CONDUCT. (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly:
(2) makes an offensive gesture or display
in a public place, and the gesture or display tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace;
(8) displays a firearm or other deadly weapon
in a public place in a manner calculated to alarm;
(10)
exposes his [edited by RPB]
in a public place and is reckless about whether another may be present who will be offended or alarmed by his act;
(c) For purposes of this section:
(1) an act is deemed to occur in a public place or near a private residence if it produces its offensive or proscribed consequences in the public place or near a private residence; and ...
(e) It is a defense to prosecution for an offense under Subsection (a)(7) or (9) that the person who discharged the firearm had a reasonable fear of bodily injury to the person or to another by a dangerous wild animal as defined by Section 822.101, Health and Safety Code
I do have snakes in my yard, but haven't needed to shoot any yet, I generally just make a contract ... you go your way, I'll go mine
(I find it an awesome fact that CHLs are among the most polite people in existence, rarely even using offensive labguage which could cost them their CHL under Sec. 42.01)
