Page 1 of 2
Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 3:03 pm
by Beiruty
So entertaining and comes from NY!
The expert on Ballistics and Stopp'en Powwar!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5w_Xtsu7uNo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gIR9iW3hp0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 5:09 pm
by tacticool
Why draw the line there instead of 12ga?
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:26 am
by AggieLCP
Five seconds in and I couldn't take this guy seriously... Hopefully anyone with half a brain would feel the same.
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:38 am
by Blindref757
Why do these YouTube ya-hoo's all take 15 minutes to get their 30 second idea across? I can't sit and watch someone ramble...it's exhausting!!!
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 12:24 pm
by C-dub
I lasted about a minute.
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:08 pm
by PocketGroove
YANKEES SUCK. Go RANGERS (and Red Sox).
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:30 pm
by Weg
He said ( very slight paraphrasing on my part, but the number of rounds he referenced is dead on ) , " Before 1994, there was no limit of how many rounds in a magazine.... you could have 100,000 rds. in a magazine it you wanted". I want one of those 100,000 round mags. Did they make them for the Glock 21?
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:46 pm
by snatchel
Wow. Now go watchhis "Truth about firefights" video.
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:50 pm
by mikeintexas
Weg wrote:He said ( very slight paraphrasing on my part, but the number of rounds he referenced is dead on ) , " Before 1994, there was no limit of how many rounds in a magazine.... you could have 100,000 rds. in a magazine it you wanted". I want one of those 100,000 round mags. Did they make them for the Glock 21?
That would tend to be a tad heavy, wouldn't it? Probably hard to conceal as well....
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:21 pm
by 68Charger
God that guy sounds annoying. His voice just makes me cringe.
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:35 pm
by Weg
I know people usually can't help where they grew up, but I always thought Northeastern accents were the most unpleasant to listen to, of all the accents in America.
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:23 pm
by C-dub
Weg wrote:He said ( very slight paraphrasing on my part, but the number of rounds he referenced is dead on ) , " Before 1994, there was no limit of how many rounds in a magazine.... you could have 100,000 rds. in a magazine it you wanted". I want one of those 100,000 round mags. Did they make them for the Glock 21?
Only in the Glock 7.
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:05 am
by rm9792
why not a .50GI? Bigger than a .45.
Re: Bigger is better, nothing less than 45!
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:57 am
by Grammy
Oh yeah I think it would be a bit difficult to wield a pistol with a 520lb magazine.
Can't bring myself to open the video after reading the comments above, sorry...