Page 1 of 1
Heritage Rough Rider?
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:12 pm
by steve817
OK I have been wanting a single action revolver for a while so I bought one in .357. In all the literature and even on the barrel it says to keep the hammer down on an empty chamber. It looks as though it has a Vaquero style transfer bar in it so why are they recommending that? Liability?
Re: Heritage Rough Rider?
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:38 am
by steve817
Anyone? Anyone?.....tap tap tap....Is this thing on?

Re: Heritage Rough Rider?
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:23 pm
by Chemist45
My guess is liability.
When Ruger got sued over the lack of a transfer bar part of the settlement was that Ruger pay for a national ad campaign to inform gun owners to keep the hammer down on an empty cylinder.
This company may be going the belt and suspenders route to minimize lawsuits.
Re: Heritage Rough Rider?
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:09 am
by AdioSS
I noticed that also on my .22 HRR. Personally, I think it is safe to carry with the hammer down on a loaded chamber because of that bar. That bar isn't just going to flip down all by itself.
Re: Heritage Rough Rider?
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:31 pm
by steve817
I wasn't aware that Ruger got sued over it. I'll have to dig around and see what I could find.
Thanks!