Page 1 of 2

Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:23 am
by Keith B
This is a hoot, but unfortunately right on target.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=3h8O7V-WxWQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:26 am
by old farmer
:tiphat:

Unable to view site? Please post URL....

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:30 am
by 74novaman
old farmer wrote::tiphat:

Unable to view site? Please post URL....
Whoever posted the video on youtube has embedding disabled, so you have to go watch on youtube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h8O7V-W ... r_embedded

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:32 am
by Keith B
Sorry, didn't show that to me initially for some reason. :???: I fixed the original post.

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:15 am
by sjfcontrol
That was GREAT! "rlol"

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:40 pm
by WildBill
sjfcontrol wrote:That was GREAT! "rlol"
:iagree: Thanks for the post Keith.
I wonder why Jimmy didn't have anything to say? :headscratch

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:05 pm
by Toorop
I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment. He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so. He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.

Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 11:35 pm
by The Annoyed Man
Toorop wrote:I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment. He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so. He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.

Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.
He also helped to kill all other rights. Thanks to that jackwagon, starting next year I get fined monthly, enforced by the IRS, for not having enough money to afford health insurance. He's a commie socialist, and Reagan, guns, or whatever, Obama IS the worst president we've ever had. Furthermore, HE only signed those things into law because they were attached to bills that he wanted worse. If he had been handed those things individually to sign off on, he'd have squashed them flat, and you KNOW that's true. So don't try to paint him as any better than Reagan on guns, because he's not. He's actually worse. At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border. The buck for that one stops with Obama.

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:03 am
by carlson1
:iagree:

Good Stuff Keith.

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:26 am
by Kadelic
The Annoyed Man wrote:At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border.
If I recollect, didn't Reagan sell weapons to Iran?

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:48 am
by JP171
Kadelic wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border.
If I recollect, didn't Reagan sell weapons to Iran?
no that was one Col. Oliver North :lol: but selling weapons to a legal government is a bit different than selling thru illegal straw purchases to a drug gang

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:09 pm
by Toorop
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Toorop wrote:I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment. He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so. He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.

Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.
He also helped to kill all other rights. Thanks to that jackwagon, starting next year I get fined monthly, enforced by the IRS, for not having enough money to afford health insurance. He's a commie socialist, and Reagan, guns, or whatever, Obama IS the worst president we've ever had. Furthermore, HE only signed those things into law because they were attached to bills that he wanted worse. If he had been handed those things individually to sign off on, he'd have squashed them flat, and you KNOW that's true. So don't try to paint him as any better than Reagan on guns, because he's not. He's actually worse. At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border. The buck for that one stops with Obama.
You do know the gun walking started under Bush, right?

So why did Reagan ban machine guns? Why can't Californians exercise their right to carry?

You've made no logical point.

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:23 pm
by Keith B
Toorop wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Toorop wrote:I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment. He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so. He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.

Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.
He also helped to kill all other rights. Thanks to that jackwagon, starting next year I get fined monthly, enforced by the IRS, for not having enough money to afford health insurance. He's a commie socialist, and Reagan, guns, or whatever, Obama IS the worst president we've ever had. Furthermore, HE only signed those things into law because they were attached to bills that he wanted worse. If he had been handed those things individually to sign off on, he'd have squashed them flat, and you KNOW that's true. So don't try to paint him as any better than Reagan on guns, because he's not. He's actually worse. At least Reagan didn't sell guns to narco traffickers on the border. The buck for that one stops with Obama.
You do know the gun walking started under Bush, right?

So why did Reagan ban machine guns? Why can't Californians exercise their right to carry?

You've made no logical point.
Yeah, the logical point is Obama is a socialist liberal. That's the point.

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:35 pm
by hi-power
:iagree: with Keith B.

I'm also not going to argue with someone who thinks "Wide Receiver" is the same as "Fast & Furious". Just a little bit of research will show the vast differences between these two failed operations.

Re: Reagan Vs. Obama - Social Economics 101

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:05 pm
by Charles L. Cotton
Toorop wrote:I think it is important to note Ronald Reagans hatred of guns and the 2nd Amendment.
That's a lie, pure and simple. Even when he almost died from a gunshot wound, he refused to support numerous gun control measures your Party tried to promote. Lying liberal Democrats did what they always do; they tried to engage in political profiteering by dancing in someone's blood.
Toorop wrote:He enacted numerous anti-2nd Amendment laws and gladly did so.
Cite them sport. And be sure to include proof that he "gladly did so."
Toorop wrote:He also happily and loudly endorsed the Brady Bill.
Really? Since you weren't even alive then, how do you know? You don't have a clue what went into the negotiations on the Brady Bill. He very reluctantly supported the watered down version only out of respect for his then-friend James Brady who had been gravely wounded in the attempt on his life. He didn't "happily and loudly" endorse the Brady Bill. You don't seem to be the least bit constrained by the truth.
Toorop wrote:Obama did sign the National parks law, and expanded gun rights on a federal level more than any POTUS in recent history.
That's false; Obama didn't sign a "National parks Law." He signed a credit card bill that he touted like an avenging angel. We added the National Parks language to the credit card bill and his attempt to have it stripped out failed. He was livid at having to sign his credit card bill with the National Parks language in it. He considered vetoing the bill but was warned it likely wouldn't pass again and certainly not without the National Parks language.

I recently participated in a radio debate with a lying liberal Democrat Houston attorney who made the exact false claim you just made and when I stated the facts I just related, he had no response. Claiming Obama willingly "expanded gun rights" is complete garbage and any attempt to convince people tells a great deal about the intellectual honesty of the person making such claims.

Chas.