AR - .22 rimfire conversion or 9x19 upper for practice ?
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 5:48 pm
Looking to practice with something a little cheaper than .223 ammo.
I see a lot of .22 rimfire conversions and have been aware of 9mm complete uppers for a long time.
It's time to try and save a few pennies, so which is the better way to go ?
From what I read here are the +/- to each :
.22 rimfire conversions
Cons:
Mags aren't cheap or commonly available
Mags are sometimes proprietary
.22 rimfire isn't reloadable
Pros:
.22 LR is cheap, available almost everywhere and easy to carry enough to shoot all day
Cheaper to purchase than a 9x19 upper
Easy to store in a range bag
9x19 complete upper
Cons:
Full uppers run $600 plus
Mag block necessary to accommodate 9x19 mags
Not as portable as a rimfire conversion
Pros:
Mags are available in a variety of styles (Colt, Sten or Uzi conversions)
9x19 ain't too shabby as a SD round especially with a 16" barrel
Brass is reloadable
Lead/cast friendly (with the right lube of course)
Will probably outlast a rimfire conversion
Either will be easy to sell should my shooting habits change, both are cheaper than shooting a steady diet of .223, recoil is very light so either would be great to introduce new shooters to the AR.
I will most likely keep whatever I buy here for years to come, so reliability and longevity are definitely a consideration.
If you have one or the other (or both) can you provide some first hand feedback on your likes/dislikes of these ?
Any idea which 9x19 upper/ mag block/ mags combination is the best solution in terms of value; price vs reliability ?
Any idea which of the rimfire conversions is the least amount of hassle ? Best bang for the buck ?
Which would you buy and why ?
Thanks for any feedback, they both look good on paper, neither is clearly superior (to me) for my needs.
I see a lot of .22 rimfire conversions and have been aware of 9mm complete uppers for a long time.
It's time to try and save a few pennies, so which is the better way to go ?
From what I read here are the +/- to each :
.22 rimfire conversions
Cons:
Mags aren't cheap or commonly available
Mags are sometimes proprietary
.22 rimfire isn't reloadable
Pros:
.22 LR is cheap, available almost everywhere and easy to carry enough to shoot all day
Cheaper to purchase than a 9x19 upper
Easy to store in a range bag
9x19 complete upper
Cons:
Full uppers run $600 plus
Mag block necessary to accommodate 9x19 mags
Not as portable as a rimfire conversion
Pros:
Mags are available in a variety of styles (Colt, Sten or Uzi conversions)
9x19 ain't too shabby as a SD round especially with a 16" barrel
Brass is reloadable
Lead/cast friendly (with the right lube of course)
Will probably outlast a rimfire conversion
Either will be easy to sell should my shooting habits change, both are cheaper than shooting a steady diet of .223, recoil is very light so either would be great to introduce new shooters to the AR.
I will most likely keep whatever I buy here for years to come, so reliability and longevity are definitely a consideration.
If you have one or the other (or both) can you provide some first hand feedback on your likes/dislikes of these ?
Any idea which 9x19 upper/ mag block/ mags combination is the best solution in terms of value; price vs reliability ?
Any idea which of the rimfire conversions is the least amount of hassle ? Best bang for the buck ?
Which would you buy and why ?
Thanks for any feedback, they both look good on paper, neither is clearly superior (to me) for my needs.