Page 1 of 3
Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:48 pm
by C-dub
Big surprise there. Not!
When they announced several days ago that she would be testifying I told my wife that she never would. I said that something will come up and she will be unable to or something. Then we heard on the news about an hour ago that she fainted and hit her head. I told her, there it is. That's her out. She couldn't possibly testify now. "sacrasm"
Just now, we heard on the news that she will be unable to testify due to the concussion. Big surprise, NOT. I wonder if Axelrod was behind her when she fell.
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:58 pm
by AEA
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:50 pm
by Oldgringo
Bless her heart, she fell down and went boom....just before the hearings started.
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:59 pm
by gringo pistolero
Oldgringo wrote:Bless her heart, she fell down and went boom
She's fallen and she can't get up?
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:38 pm
by Jaguar
gringo pistolero wrote:Oldgringo wrote:Bless her heart, she fell down and went boom
She's fallen and she can't get up?
She will be up in time for the next election.
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:54 pm
by baldeagle
Jaguar wrote:She will be up in time for the next election.
Dear Lord, please promise that hag will never be our President. Please. Please. Please.
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:44 am
by Dave2
baldeagle wrote:Jaguar wrote:She will be up in time for the next election.
Dear Lord, please promise that hag will never be our President. Please. Please. Please.
The ads
should say something about how she's opposed to freedom of speech over some of her Benghazi statements, and that
should be enough to keep her from even ranking in the primaries, but sometimes I wonder...
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:05 am
by 57Coastie
A new low.
Jim
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:23 am
by Abraham
Jim,
Please clarify: "A new low"
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:06 am
by 57Coastie
Abraham wrote:Jim,
Please clarify: "A new low"
Gladly, Abraham. This thread is leading the way in the race to the bottom.
Jim
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:36 am
by Abraham
Jim,
I guess I'm rather slow: I still have no clue what you mean?
Is it: The previous posters are being unfair/wrong in their doubt regarding Ms. Clinton's illness/injury or yes, her illness/injury is a ruse for her not testifying?
Thanks
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:09 am
by 57Coastie
Abraham wrote:Jim,
I guess I'm rather slow: I still have no clue what you mean?
Is it: The previous posters are being unfair/wrong in their doubt regarding Ms. Clinton's illness/injury or yes, her illness/injury is a ruse for her not testifying?
Thanks
No comment on your first sentence, Abraham.
As to the second: the former, Abraham, the former.
Jim
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:12 am
by Abraham
Thanks Jim.
I too doubt her veracity.
However, there's time for her to come forward - if she doesn't, our doubt will be confirmed...
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:29 am
by 57Coastie
Abraham wrote:Thanks Jim.
I too doubt her veracity.
However, there's time for her to come forward - if she doesn't, our doubt will be confirmed...
Are you saying, Abraham, that if she does not testify on the present Foreign Relations Committee schedule because she is obeying her doctor's orders, then your doubt will be confirmed?
Anywhere else I would have to say that I must be reading that wrong, but on this forum I am accustomed to seeing such grossly faulty syllogisms.
Jim
Re: Hillary NOT testifying on Benghazi.
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:32 am
by ffemt300
How convenient for her...
