TexasCHLforum.com

Has anyone seen/handled/fired/own a Bulgarian Krinkov SLR-106U pistol from Arsenal? It's chambered in 5.56 and was hoping to get some feedback before looking further into this gun. Thanks in advance.

hpcatx wrote:Has anyone seen/handled/fired/own a Bulgarian Krinkov SLR-106U pistol from Arsenal? It's chambered in 5.56 and was hoping to get some feedback before looking further into this gun. Thanks in advance.

Aresnal are excellent copy or Russian "stuff" that means they are good in my book. I am not sure about your no-stock krinkos as I prefer to have a semi-auto copy with a folding stock.

Thanks! Have an opportunity to pick up one for slightly under pre-insanity pricing, so considering it. I tend to agree about the stock, so I'll have to compare options and pricing. This is a decent enough of a deal, that maybe I can add a folding stock and whatever other parts are required to be 922(r) compliant. Only issue then is that it would require a tax stamp due to barrel length, and I'm not sure I want to invest that much into this acquisition. (Do Title II items need to be 922(r) compliant?)

hpcatx wrote:Thanks! Have an opportunity to pick up one for slightly under pre-insanity pricing, so considering it. I tend to agree about the stock, so I'll have to compare options and pricing. This is a decent enough of a deal, that maybe I can add a folding stock and whatever other parts are required to be 922(r) compliant. Only issue then is that it would require a tax stamp due to barrel length, and I'm not sure I want to invest that much into this acquisition. (Do Title II items need to be 922(r) compliant?)

Be careful, if it is originally a pistol you can not converted to SBR unless you are a FFL manufacturer. Or, so I understand the law.

Beiruty wrote:Be careful, if it is originally a pistol you can not converted to SBR unless you are a FFL manufacturer. Or, so I understand the law.

Good to know. I'd be checking with my FFL who is licensed for Class III before making the purchase; he's also an attorney and knows this stuff backwards and forwards. Even if it were legal, the requirement for the tax stamp would probably mean I'd be spending more on this than I would want to anyway. Thanks, Beiruty!