TexasCHLforum.com

DEMOCRATS!!!

Shocker!

http://clashdaily.com/2013/01/the-5-wor ... democrats/

Ft Hood: Registered Democrat and radical Muslim who supported Al Qaeda and Hamas.
Columbine: Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals.
Virginia Tech: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff - registered democrat.
Colorado Theater: Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal.
Connecticut School Shooter: Registered Democrat; hated Christians.

“While there is no law or set of laws that can prevent every senseless act of violence completely, no piece of legislation that will prevent every tragedy, every act of evil, if there’s even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try.”
Barack Obama

Yep. Not PC to say it but with 75% of gun crime comming from one side of the isle... seems like there should be "one thing" he could do other than taking away rights from the people who are following the law.

Register Democrats, NOT guns!

puma guy wrote:Register Democrats, NOT guns!

NO! Register (to vote) more Republicans

I looked at the article, and there were a lot of comments (minus the truly lefty types) that asked this question, which I would like to know as well: what are the source(s) for the information? I'm not saying its not true (in fact, I distinctly remember reading that the killer in Tucson was a liberal-progressive type) but being able to cite sources at least shuts down all but the hardcore trolls.

K.Mooneyham wrote:I looked at the article, and there were a lot of comments (minus the truly lefty types) that asked this question, which I would like to know as well: what are the source(s) for the information? I'm not saying its not true (in fact, I distinctly remember reading that the killer in Tucson was a liberal-progressive type) but being able to cite sources at least shuts down all but the hardcore trolls.

I dunno, I just linked the article. But it has to be true, IT'S ON THE INTERNET!

Topbuilder wrote:....... if there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got an obligation to try.”
Barack Obama

If that is true, then why are we funding Planned Parenthood and similar operations?

It is beyond ironic that the loudest weepers and wailers about gun rights for the most part would have happily favored offing those kids 6 or 7 years ago, and even expected the government to pay for it.

What if a teacher or someone else with a gun could save 26 lives? It is stupid and criminal not to give that a try.

mojo84 wrote:What if a teacher or someone else with a gun could save 26 lives? It is stupid and criminal not to give that a try.

Precisely. These are criminals and thugs trying to take our rights away. Stupid morons.

K.Mooneyham wrote:I looked at the article, and there were a lot of comments (minus the truly lefty types) that asked this question, which I would like to know as well: what are the source(s) for the information? I'm not saying its not true (in fact, I distinctly remember reading that the killer in Tucson was a liberal-progressive type) but being able to cite sources at least shuts down all but the hardcore trolls.

I submit as one small piece of evidence, since you do NOT hear or read every time Jarred's name is mentioned:
"Republican, Jarred Laughtner"
"Jarred Laughtner, who is a conservative,"
"Jarred Laughtner, who BTW is not a Democrat"

that he is in fact, a Democrat...

Topbuilder wrote: I submit as one small piece of evidence, since you do NOT hear or read every time Jarred's name is mentioned:
"Republican, Jarred Laughtner"
"Jarred Laughtner, who is a conservative,"
"Jarred Laughtner, who BTW is not a Democrat"

that he is in fact, a Democrat...

pretty much.

It's almost a 100% guarantee that if the media doesn't mention the party of the individual involved in a politically sensitive event, that person is a liberal and Democrat.

baldeagle wrote:It's almost a 100% guarantee that if the media doesn't mention the party of the individual involved in a politically sensitive event, that person is a liberal and Democrat.

Case and point : An entire Ray nagin 'fraud/corruption article... no mention of party affiliation.

This is why anti's want gun control they area afraid of their own.

related Wild Bill video
http://ncrenegade.com/editorial/liberals-with-guns/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I like that guy