i8godzilla wrote:The workers in those factories are also voters. They should ask their union which candidates they endorsed and whether those elected voted for or against more gun control laws.
Even so, they represent a small fraction of all of New York's voters. Although the union's answer would be relevant, it would have no impact. The only thing that can have an impact is for the factory to move out of New York, presumably to a gun friendly state, and take the jobs with it.
It's not just about political vengeance. If a Bushmaster rifle is illegal in New York, then can the company
manufacture and ship them in New York with impunity? If not, then it isn't just potential New York sales that are affected. You won't be able to buy a Bushmaster AR, or a Remington R15 in
Texas, because the company cannot legally be in possession of them in
New York. So Remington/Bushmaster don't just lose the New York sales, they loose the Texas sales, the Oklahoma sales, the Michigan sales, heck, even the California sales, etc., etc., etc. It means that they are
entirely out of the AR15/AR10 business!
THAT is what it means if the company does not move. And for that matter, I would love to see Springfield move out of Illinois; Charter and Chaparral Arms, Colt, Marlin, PTR 91, Inc., Mossberg, Ruger, Seecamp, and Stag Arms leave Connecticut; Auto-Ordinance, S&W, Savage, Kahr, NEF, Troy Industries, and Yankee Hill Machine Co., Inc. leave Massachusetts; S&W/Walther, and Bushmaster/Windham leave Maine; and ACC, Sig Arms, and Thompson Center leave New Hampshire. None of those knucklehead voters in those states deserves to have those companies added into the state's tax base.
It is merely a historical accident that all of those manufacturers are located in the northeast. It has nothing to do with lack of manufacturing capacity, or availability of raw materials, or availability of a skilled workforce in other states. Those companies were either founded in the northeast simply because that's where the first colonies were located, or they were spunoff/purchased/renamed/etc. from existing northeastern manufacturers. That's the only reason they are all located there. As it happens those states are overwhelmingly hostile to the products those companies make, and the vast majority of their products are sold out of state in places where gun-ownership is not regarded as anathema. They should all relocate to those parts of the nation where A) their manufacturing costs will go down, B) their taxes will go down, and C) statewide support for their existence and profitability will go up. Nothing else makes any sense at all. It really doesn't matter if New York State gives Remington huge tax breaks to stay there, if their profitability suffers.