Page 1 of 2

Printing

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:21 pm
by BrassMonkey
What statute addresses printing?

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:52 pm
by dpatterson
Here are a few links to other post that talk about printing. You will find that alot of topics have been discussed several times. You can find them by searching the forums.

http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... t=printing
http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... t=printing
http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... t=printing
http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... t=printing


And to answer your question I do not think there is anything that speaks to "Printing". I think its more of Failure to Conceal.
DP

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:53 pm
by BrassMonkey
Thanks DP,
I was specifically looking for Texas Statutes... I will go thru the posts as well ;-)

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:17 pm
by seamusTX
You can look at two statutes:
GC §411.171. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter: (3) "Concealed handgun" means a handgun, the presence of which is not openly discernible to the ordinary observation of a reasonable person.
PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE HOLDER. (a) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and intentionally fails to conceal the handgun.
People argue incessantly about the definition of printing and whether it is illegal. I've never heard of anyone being arrested for it in Texas.

I am not a lawyer, etc.

- Jim

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:25 pm
by NcongruNt
Well, from my understanding in reading the law and the multiple discussions here, there is nothing illegal about unintentional printing. It has to be shown that you intentionally failed to conceal your weapon.

PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE
HOLDER. (a) A license holder commits an offense if the license
holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person
under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code,
and intentionally fails to conceal the handgun.

Beyond that, you face people freaking out if you don't do a good enough job of concealing. That can turn into a panicked call to 911 about you, and subsequent hassle and possible legal costs of defending yourself, as has been discussed in these forums.

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:26 pm
by NcongruNt
Gah, you beat me to it, Seamus. :o

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:45 pm
by seamusTX
NcongruNt wrote:Gah, you beat me to it, Seamus.
I didn't know it was a race. :grin:

- Jim

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:33 pm
by NcongruNt
seamusTX wrote:
NcongruNt wrote:Gah, you beat me to it, Seamus.
I didn't know it was a race. :grin:

- Jim
Well, if it was, you won!

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:53 pm
by CWOOD
seamusTX wrote:You can look at two statutes:
GC §411.171. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter: (3) "Concealed handgun" means a handgun, the presence of which is not openly discernible to the ordinary observation of a reasonable person.
PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE HOLDER. (a) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and intentionally fails to conceal the handgun.
People argue incessantly about the definition of printing and whether it is illegal. I've never heard of anyone being arrested for it in Texas.

I am not a lawyer, etc.

- Jim
These are indeed the applicable legal citations. The reason that so many folks can argue about the meaning of "discernible", "ordinary observation", "reasonable person", and "intentionally", is that these terms and statutes have not been clearly set in case law.

For the most part, this means that it is not a great problem area. Printing as a legal offense does not exist so forget that term...kind of like brandishing. These terms may be pertinent in other states but not Texas.

When I first started carrying with a CHL, a couple of renewals ago, it seemed that EVERYONE must be able to see my weapon. The fact of the matter is the NO ONE sees it unless you take it out and wave it around.

I once had occasion where I walked around for about an hour in public, including at the home of a daughter's teacher, with my weapon fully exposed in an IWB holster. It had accidently or carelessly been 'untucked' for that whole time until my daughter let me know. NO ONE "saw" it even though it was in plain sight.

I frequently carry a Glock 30 IWB under an untucked T-shirt, under a tucked sport shirt with no othr cover garment. Never had a problem. Even untucked with a light windbreaker and the wind blows it open, never had a problem. Take reasonable precautions but don't obsess.

Finally, I know you didn't ask about all of this so disregard if you like. I guess I was also addressing the concern about this topic generally.

Sorry if went too far afield of you topic.

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:01 pm
by BrassMonkey
This is all what I was looking for. I too was unable to find a statute that describes "printing" as against the law....

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:50 pm
by longtooth
Remember rule # 3 and 4.
#3. good gunbelt & holster.
#4. Put it on, cover it up, & leave it alone.

Do these two things & no one will know you have it on except you. If you obey #3 then you will forget until you need it. ;-)
LT

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:46 pm
by frankie_the_yankee
seamusTX wrote:
You can look at two statutes:
GC §411.171. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter: (3) "Concealed handgun" means a handgun, the presence of which is not openly discernible to the ordinary observation of a reasonable person.
PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE HOLDER. (a) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and intentionally fails to conceal the handgun.
People argue incessantly about the definition of printing and whether it is illegal. I've never heard of anyone being arrested for it in Texas.

I am not a lawyer, etc.

- Jim
14 convicted of this offense in 2005.

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/administra ... rt2005.pdf

Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:52 pm
by seamusTX
frankie_the_yankee wrote:14 convicted of this offense in 2005.
People were convicted of unlawful carry by a license holder. We don't know what they did.

I've never heard of anyone being arrested because they bent over in the grocery store or that sort of thing. The only arrest that I know the facts about (second-hand) was a guy who flashed in an argument.

- Jim

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:40 am
by txinvestigator
frankie_the_yankee wrote:
seamusTX wrote:
You can look at two statutes:
GC §411.171. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter: (3) "Concealed handgun" means a handgun, the presence of which is not openly discernible to the ordinary observation of a reasonable person.
PC §46.035. UNLAWFUL CARRYING OF HANDGUN BY LICENSE HOLDER. (a) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and intentionally fails to conceal the handgun.
People argue incessantly about the definition of printing and whether it is illegal. I've never heard of anyone being arrested for it in Texas.

I am not a lawyer, etc.

- Jim
14 convicted of this offense in 2005.

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/administra ... rt2005.pdf
As SeamusTX noted, we don't know which of the 10 violations under this law the people were convicted of.

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:01 am
by frankie_the_yankee
seamusTX wrote:
frankie_the_yankee wrote:14 convicted of this offense in 2005.
People were convicted of unlawful carry by a license holder. We don't know what they did.

I've never heard of anyone being arrested because they bent over in the grocery store or that sort of thing. The only arrest that I know the facts about (second-hand) was a guy who flashed in an argument.

- Jim
Neither have I.

+1