Page 1 of 1
Re: Sketchy Judge says NY exempt from USA Constitution
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 7:47 pm
by jmra
Bad decision, but at least the 7 round limit was struck down. More than I expected.
Re: Sketchy Judge says NY exempt from USA Constitution
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:50 pm
by JALLEN
The headline and text do not accurately portray the decision or the basis therefor. However much you dislike it, please at least stick to what happened, or, if you must, start your comments with "Once Upon A Time..." so we know.
I don't appreciate wasting time trying to find the part of the opinion where this Federal judge decided "....expanded bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines were legally sound because they served to undermine civil rights protected by the Constitution."
Re: Sketchy Judge says NY exempt from USA Constitution
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 7:55 am
by b322da
JALLEN wrote:The headline and text do not accurately portray the decision or the basis therefor. However much you dislike it, please at least stick to what happened, or, if you must, start your comments with "Once Upon A Time..." so we know.
I don't appreciate wasting time trying to find the part of the opinion where this Federal judge decided "....expanded bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines were legally sound because they served to undermine civil rights protected by the Constitution."
Had to read 57 pages.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014 ... uling.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Jim
Re: Sketchy Judge says NY exempt from USA Constitution
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 11:33 am
by Charles L. Cotton
JALLEN wrote:The headline and text do not accurately portray the decision or the basis therefor. However much you dislike it, please at least stick to what happened, or, if you must, start your comments with "Once Upon A Time..." so we know.
I don't appreciate wasting time trying to find the part of the opinion where this Federal judge decided "....expanded bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines were legally sound because they served to undermine civil rights protected by the Constitution."
You are correct. Plus, the OP used a fake email address and an inappropriate username, so he and his posts are gone.
Chas.