TexasCHLforum.com

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucac/20070419/c ... adfreezone

"Only one policy has ever been shown to deter mass murder:
Concealed carry laws."

Yep. Bet she can shoot too.

Agreed! Gotta love Annie Baby. I also really like Doug Giles at Townhall. I got hooked on his article's when I read this; http://www.townhall.com/columnists/Doug ... e_pavement

Good ol' Coulter. She drives Libs nuts and drives young male republicans crazy
You've gotta lover her bluntness and razor sharp facts with a side serving of kick-yer-hiney wit.

Down boys!

kauboy wrote:Good ol' Coulter. She drives Libs nuts and drives young male republicans crazy
You've gotta lover her bluntness and razor sharp facts with a side serving of kick-yer-hiney wit.

Young? Thank you!

The only thing I would ever add to one of her artcles would be to this idea...

"Only one policy has ever been shown to deter mass murder: concealed-carry laws."

And the "aggressiveness" to oppose deadly criminal acts...

I believe she would totally agree with me there...

Y'all don't have to...

The sad thing is, the libs she is referring too are so anti gun that they will try to come up with every thing that they can think of to stop the next assault. They bring up ideas of massive paging systems and direct phone lines to the local law enforcement agency, metal detectors everywhere (like that’s feasible), security guards (notice I did not say armed) and a countless other idiotic ideas. Honestly, if you have someone shooting up a class of unarmed students, how long do you think it will take LEO to respond, assess, enter and secure a campus??

As long as there is opposition to concealed carry by a small majority of libs and lefts, then the criminals will continue to have a place to go where they are not worried about someone returning fire.

Ok off my soap box… had too vent.

Sludge wrote:The sad thing is, the libs she is referring too are so anti gun that they will try to come up with every thing that they can think of to stop the next assault. They bring up ideas of massive paging systems and direct phone lines to the local law enforcement agency, metal detectors everywhere (like that’s feasible), security guards (notice I did not say armed) and a countless other idiotic ideas. Honestly, if you have someone shooting up a class of unarmed students, how long do you think it will take LEO to respond, assess, enter and secure a campus??

As long as there is opposition to concealed carry by a small majority of libs and lefts, then the criminals will continue to have a place to go where they are not worried about someone returning fire.

Ok off my soap box… had too vent.

Why would such a small minority have so much power?

Liberty wrote:

Sludge wrote:The sad thing is, the libs she is referring too are so anti gun that they will try to come up with every thing that they can think of to stop the next assault. They bring up ideas of massive paging systems and direct phone lines to the local law enforcement agency, metal detectors everywhere (like that’s feasible), security guards (notice I did not say armed) and a countless other idiotic ideas. Honestly, if you have someone shooting up a class of unarmed students, how long do you think it will take LEO to respond, assess, enter and secure a campus??

As long as there is opposition to concealed carry by a small majority of libs and lefts, then the criminals will continue to have a place to go where they are not worried about someone returning fire.

Ok off my soap box… had too vent.

Why would such a small minority have so much power?

I am probably way off here, but I feel that a lot of it spins off of the mainstream media who love to give them the spot light, example Rosie O. A handful of people have a platform to voice their opinion and the sheeple drink it in.

Simple enough people that are anti gun will do what ever they can, use what ever example they can, to greatly reduce our rights to carry and own guns and use instances such as Columbine and VT as a reason for such. I know that I, such as the ones that I mention, have strong opinions on fire arms. However I truly believe that the best defense against an armed assailant is an armed defender. That’s where my opinion is different than the ones that are for a reduction of an armed society.

Lets face facts here people. Guns are not going anywhere. As long as there are guns and criminals, then there will always be a need for an armed society to counter such threat. No matter how many laws and “gun free zones� that they try to put in place a, criminal with ill intent is going to do what he/she wants to do.

Sludge wrote:

Liberty wrote: Why would such a small minority have so much power?

I am probably way off here, but I feel that a lot of it spins off of the mainstream media who love to give them the spot light, example Rosie O. A handful of people have a platform to voice their opinion and the sheeple drink it in.

Simple enough people that are anti gun will do what ever they can, use what ever example they can, to greatly reduce our rights to carry and own guns and use instances such as Columbine and VT as a reason for such. I know that I, such as the ones that I mention, have strong opinions on fire arms. However I truly believe that the best defense against an armed assailant is an armed defender. That’s where my opinion is different than the ones that are for a reduction of an armed society.

Lets face facts here people. Guns are not going anywhere. As long as there are guns and criminals, then there will always be a need for an armed society to counter such threat. No matter how many laws and “gun free zones� that they try to put in place a, criminal with ill intent is going to do what he/she wants to do.

while I do believe we are in a majority, it isn't a fat one.
I was born and raised in Massachussetts.. Yet I have seldom met anyone who would claim they ever voted for Teddy Kennedy. Most people held him in very low regard.. How could this be ?? How did he get elected?

I worked in a field where most people tend to be conservative. Also non union

I tended to socialize with people who were like minded ?

Many liberals just want to get along and might not want to confront their sicko ideas with an avowed Libertarian.

some liberals are just to embarrassed to admit they could vote for a stinkin Kennedy

I lived in a conservative corner of a liberal democtratic state.

Because of these things I didn't see much of the liberals who around me.. Every one denied voting for the Kennedy even though he Continues to get voted in by 2 to 1 margins. Conservatives might be the silent majority, but liberals are the invisable voters.

Excellent!

Liberty wrote: . . . Conservatives might be the silent majority, but liberals are the invisable voters.

Some states - Texas for one - are considering laws that require presenting identification in order to vote . . . just like you have to do in order to cash a check, board a commercial airliner, or show to a police officer who stops you for a moving vehicle violation.

Various groups - as far as I can see, all on the left - are squealing like stuck pigs at the prospect that voting will be limited to living citizens who can identify who they are and where they live.

Perhaps some of these "invisible" liberal voters are illegal aliens, dead, or fictitious.