TexasCHLforum.com

Ruger expanding LRC product line, again. New 9mm 5-holer. About 4 ounces heavier than 38+P version. And evidently weighs just a bit more than .357 version. Moon clips optional ?http://www.ruger.com/news/2014-09-22.html

Greybeard wrote:Ruger expanding LRC product line, again. New 9mm 5-holer. About 4 ounces heavier than 38+P version. And evidently weighs just a bit more than .357 version. Moon clips optional ?http://www.ruger.com/news/2014-09-22.html

I am seriously thinking about picking up one of these bad boys.

Joe

Highly intrigued. I mean I already have an LCR in .22 Mag but a 9mm version is seriously hard to pass up even though I've got a small 9mm semi-auto that already fills the gap. Academy will be seeing a lot more of me until I can get my hands on one.

I do not understand the appeal of a 9mm revolver. Can one of you give me some insight?

mojo84 wrote:I do not understand the appeal of a 9mm revolver. Can one of you give me some insight?

I tend to agree with you, but I'd say the company has done its homework on this one - they're not going to invest the money on the tooling if they think it is a failed proposition.

From the article referenced in the OP:

"Since its introduction in 2009, the LCR has become extremely popular with conceal carry customers seeking the simplicity of a revolver," said Chris Killoy, Ruger President and Chief Operating Officer. "Customers have been asking for a 9mm version due to ammo availability and compatibility with pistols. We were listening and have added a 9mm version of the LCR," he concluded.

5 rds of 9mm? and then transition to a glock?

kidding aside i could see this being a good backup gun on your ankle for sure

I've always thought that 9MM (or any rimless cartridge) revolvers were odd and interesting. On one hand, it might be a hassle to have to use moon clips, but on the other hand, they also help with reloading. .38 Special isn't too hard to find in my area, but there's always a greater selection of 9MM pretty much anywhere. Plus, it's likely that most people already own something in 9MM, so you wouldn't have to start buying a different caliber just to feed one gun. As we all know, the truth will be in the sales numbers.

Vol Texan wrote:

mojo84 wrote:I do not understand the appeal of a 9mm revolver. Can one of you give me some insight?

I tend to agree with you, but I'd say the company has done its homework on this one - they're not going to invest the money on the tooling if they think it is a failed proposition.

From the article referenced in the OP:

"Since its introduction in 2009, the LCR has become extremely popular with conceal carry customers seeking the simplicity of a revolver," said Chris Killoy, Ruger President and Chief Operating Officer. "Customers have been asking for a 9mm version due to ammo availability and compatibility with pistols. We were listening and have added a 9mm version of the LCR," he concluded.

My question was 100% just that, a question. I have no opinion regarding their decision to make one or why people want one. Nor was I questioning their decision.

I'm just curious what the advantage or appeal of a 9mm revolver is.

I think one benefit contributing to the appeal of a 9mm revolver is that it makes one heck of a backup gun. If you carry a 9mm semiauto and run into trouble then you have a backup that eats the same ammo. I was shown once by an old timer how easy it is to load a revolver from a mag. Pretty quick and slick. Of course that would depend on whether it requires moon clips or not.

Texsquatch wrote: Of course that would depend on whether it requires moon clips or not.

It requires moon clips.

mojo84 wrote:

Texsquatch wrote: Of course that would depend on whether it requires moon clips or not.

It requires moon clips.

No, they're optional. Moon clips just allow for use of the ejector.

CoffeeNut wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

Texsquatch wrote: Of course that would depend on whether it requires moon clips or not.

It requires moon clips.

No, they're optional. Moon clips just allow for use of the ejector.

Interesting. What holds the shell in the cylinder if the moon clip is removed? I actually believe the moon clips are required and the moon clip is designed so that the shells can be ejected without having to use a moon clip tool.

From the Ruger website.

9mm Luger Model
The LCR® in 9mm Luger model has an optimized charge hole design for positive ejection over a wide range of ammunition. The easy to load full moon clips act as a speed loader for quick reloads and its design allows for loading and unloading without the use of a moon clip tool.

Then again, I may be misinterpreting what I am reading.

For about the same amount of money you can have a 9mm semiauto about the same size that holds more than 5 rounds :).

I have never seen the need for a revolver that shoots semiautomatic pistol cartridges. Just buy a compact/subcompact semiautomatic pistol.

Just my .02,
LeonCarr

Apparently, I am wrong. According to Jeff, http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger-LCR9mm.htm, the moon clips are not required.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4egNYn3CeDQ#t=444" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Is the 9mm LCR the same size as the 38/357? I wonder if it fits current holsters for the LCR is why I ask.