Page 1 of 1

Degradation of education

Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 10:04 pm
by The Annoyed Man
I posted about this topic once a long time ago in response to someone else's thread, and I was asked at the time if I could provide a link. At the time, I could not remember where I'd seen it before; but the statement I made was that a lot of college students today would have a hard time passing a 19th century high school exam. I still don't have the original source for that claim, but I ran across this item today which tends to support that notion:

http://grandfather-economic-report.com/1895-test.htm

This is a school exam given to 8th graders in Salina Kansas, in 1895. I will stick to my guns and say that most college students today could not pass this exam in the time allotted, without Internet access or a digital calculator.

Snopes (http://www.snopes.com/language/document/1895exam.asp) says the exam is real, but questions the validity of the point, and indeed, it even points to an older exam from 1870 which seems even more difficult. I quibble with Snopes though. They said:
If a 40-year-old can't score as well on a geography test as a high school student who just spent several weeks memorizing the names of all the rivers in South America in preparation for an exam, that doesn't mean the 40-year-old's education was woefully deficient — it means the he simply didn't retain information for which he had no use, no matter how thoroughly it was drilled into his brain through rote memory some twenty-odd years earlier.
I beg to differ. I am 62, not 40, and I can still remember nearly everything I was taught in middle school geography...... and believe me, I'm not exactly a genius. I'm just teachable.

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 10:40 pm
by mojo84
TAM, I think, based on what I've seen you post on here, your retention level is far greater than the average Joe.

I do not consider myself stupid or a genius. I have trouble helping my 7th grade daughter with her homework. I can usually figure it out by relearning it and utilizing my reasoning skills. However, I can assure you, I did not retain all I was taught.

Then again, I may be dumber than I realize.

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 1:27 am
by LeakyWaders
Some have a better mental filing system (photographic memory) and some have burned out to many brain cells.

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 6:55 am
by jmra
When I was a teenager I could memorize nearly anything. My Dad was a Pastor and my brother and I competed nationally and actually were national champions in a competition called Teen Bible Quiz. Not only could we quote entire books of the Bible, but we could recite chapter and verse upon request and pull data from multiple sources of scripture with less than a minute to provide detailed answers. Although certain passages are still engrained in my head, I couldn't begin to quote an entire chapter much less an entire book.
I have sons in 7th and 9th grade taking advanced classes through an online public school. I finished 5th in my class (would have been second but opted for early release work program my senior year) and still am little use in helping them with their work. My wife who has multiple degrees doesn't fair much better.
Working in education as a testing coordinator we often stress to students how important it is to take the SAT and the ACT their junior year as much of the material on the tests are covered in their first 3 years of HS. Often advanced students who take the tests both years will score better their junior year than they do their senior year.
Many will disagree with with me, but in the Information Age that we live in, I would much rather dedicate time teaching my kids deductive reasoning and how to find information/solutions than making them memorize information that most people's brains simply files away so deeply that it is barely remembered or discards completely shortly after a test and no longer feels the need to retain the information.

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:29 am
by jimlongley
The Annoyed Man wrote: . . .
I beg to differ. I am 62, not 40, and I can still remember nearly everything I was taught in middle school geography...... and believe me, I'm not exactly a genius. I'm just teachable.
And at 68 I am much more well versed in almost all of the subjects I "took" in high school. Let's just say that between dyslexia, boredom, and the feeling that some of my teachers were not much more than carnival shills, I was not a highly motivated student. I have become a voracious reader, I rose to the same level in the phone company as my father, who had a Master's Degree, even if it took me longer, and retired, legitimately retired, younger than many of my contemporaries.

One of the biggest ironies to me is that due to my "learning difficulties" I was put in the "dummies" curriculum, which did not feature courses in, among other things, binary math, a new and advanced subject in those days. At the end of my career I was nominated and selected to be one of the technical trainers and course developers at the phone companies' combined national training center Bellcore Technical Education Center in Lisle, IL.

And one of the courses I taught was binary, and I was real good at it. :anamatedbanana

As far as the dumbing down, I cringe, regularly. The other day, in a newspaper article, I saw: "He noticed that the nut was to lose, and he was afraid he would loose it." And many many more.

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:53 am
by ELB
If you don't know some facts and information to start with, you don't HAVE any analytical or reasoning skills. It's like saying you have artistic skills but you've never delved into the details of paint, canvas, stone, chisels, pencil, ink depth perception, color, how humans and animals move, or how trees grow. Without in depth knowledge, you can't even begin to sort out any new problem. You can't look up what you don't know exists, and you can't make a timely, appropriate response to emerging events and problems if you have no background information.

The most basic elements are usually not terribly exciting and often require just brute memorization -- how to spell, how to match verbs with their subjects, knowing basic addition, subtraction, multiplication, division. Without those you can't even begin to realistically move on to more abstract knowledge and reasoning, and at every layer there are more things you must simply know in order to move on correctly. Without a solid grounding in historical facts and events (and every school subject is, at its core, historical information), you can't recognize when certain kinds of events are repeating themselves, how humans have tried and failed or succeeded at certain ways to organize society, to recognize historical bull when some politician is laying on the blarney about how "the other" is oppressing his people, how to recognize social fads.

The societies of the world are indeed getting more complex, and there is indeed more to know and more to think about. Dealing with it by cutting back on the depth of education to cover more breadth is what is illustrated when comparing old textbooks to modern ones. The trouble is it is strategy for failure. You don't have time to "look up" information on every new event that comes along, and won't even recognize when you're being fed baloney. You get stuff like polls that show people think DNA should be banned or H2O regulated by the government as a dangerous substance. You become someone easily manipulated by others.


Having facts and information readily available is a critical analytical and reasoning skill in and of itself, and some things just have to be learned. Yes there are some methodologies that are separate from the information they are acting on, but that information sometimes just has to be crammed in your skull one way or another, and now there's a lot more "basic" knowledge to know than there used to be.

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 11:37 am
by SewTexas
other things also come into play for the older person....is the person on BP meds, does the older person have or ever had anemia? etc. all of these things can add up to a variety of hole in your memory, believe me, I know, it's a problem and often rather embarrassing.

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 4:30 pm
by The Annoyed Man
jmra wrote:When I was a teenager I could memorize nearly anything. My Dad was a Pastor and my brother and I competed nationally and actually were national champions in a competition called Teen Bible Quiz. Not only could we quote entire books of the Bible, but we could recite chapter and verse upon request and pull data from multiple sources of scripture with less than a minute to provide detailed answers. Although certain passages are still engrained in my head, I couldn't begin to quote an entire chapter much less an entire book.
I have sons in 7th and 9th grade taking advanced classes through an online public school. I finished 5th in my class (would have been second but opted for early release work program my senior year) and still am little use in helping them with their work. My wife who has multiple degrees doesn't fair much better.
Working in education as a testing coordinator we often stress to students how important it is to take the SAT and the ACT their junior year as much of the material on the tests are covered in their first 3 years of HS. Often advanced students who take the tests both years will score better their junior year than they do their senior year.
Many will disagree with with me, but in the Information Age that we live in, I would much rather dedicate time teaching my kids deductive reasoning and how to find information/solutions than making them memorize information that most people's brains simply files away so deeply that it is barely remembered or discards completely shortly after a test and no longer feels the need to retain the information.
I agree that probably the best thing that a college education can give is the ability to think critically (which is a skill sadly lacking from a lot of the nation's universities these days), but thinking without data is a waste of time called "daydreaming", and the skilled thinker has TWO things at his/her disposal: 1) a reserve store of knowledge upon which to base some preliminary hunches/theorems/assumptions; and 2) the knowledge of where to find additional information to complete your process.

For instance.... Every leap forward that Albert Einstein made was predicated on previously existing knowledge that he had internalized; and at its point of origin, it started with the physics that he learned in stodgy old textbooks as a young student.....with established theorems he had to learn, and equations that he had to memorize, before he could prove them in a lab, and then build on those things, one brick at a time, until he arrived at relativity, and his (less well-known to the layperson) work in number arrays and tensors (which are well above my pay grade...).

As far as the literary classics go, to quote Ecclesiastes 1:9, "What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun." There are no great literary themes being written about today that haven't been written about for millennia. There are people today who advocate banning Mark Twain's "Huckleberry Finn" and Joseph Conrad's "The N----- of the Narcissus" because both books contain the "N-word".........and in so doing, they lose two things: 1) they lose a connection to a rich part of humanity's past heritage; and 2) they miss out of some of the most important pro-civil rights writing of the 19th century. In getting rid of these two seminal works, we get rid of two of the most important works that taught white readers about the commonalities of race. We have shrunken our vocabulary - at the expense of our culture - because people are ignorant about meanings and too easily offended: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controvers ... ggardly%22.

I could go on. jmra, I get what your saying. I do. But the "Information Age" didn't start with personal computers and the Internet. When I was a kid, we had to learn how to use the Dewey Decimal System to locate library books as part of our search for information. The idea of a personal computer was still science fiction. Man hadn't even been to the Moon yet, and computers with limited capabilities filled entire buildings. All that personal computers and the web did was make the searches faster. But that doesn't change the fact that you have to know how to search. Back in the old days circa maybe 1993, and being a total n00b to the internet and completely unaware of the consequences at the time, I once did an Alta Vista search of the term "furry animals", because I wanted to print out some pictures for my toddler son. I was rewarded with a bunch of links which.....let's just say were not fit for mixed company. I knew "how" to search....as in, how to type words into a search box and click "submit"; but I didn't know how to search contextually, because PART of that context is the totality of possible Internet searches. If you mean something very innocent by "furry animals", but 999,999 other users mean something entirely different, you're not going to get results that are germain to your search. But even the Dewey Decimal System was like that.......just less likely to show you something you shouldn't see..... because town libraries didn't stock that kind of trash. "Lady Chatterly's Lover" and Chaucer's "The Miller's Tale" from "Canterbury Tales" was about as risqué as any library would get.

So when I look at the exam linked at the top of this thread, these are less about specific facts, then they are about the generalized kind of facts which are the basis for a good search and which would be good to have already internalized. For instance, when I look at the geography questions:
Geography (Time, one hour)
  1. What is climate? Upon what does climate depend?
  2. How do you account for the extremes of climate in Kansas?
  3. Of what use are rivers? Of what use is the ocean?
  4. Describe the mountains of N.A.
  5. Name and describe the following: Monrovia, Odessa, Denver, Manitoba, Hecla, Yukon, St. Helena, Juan Fermandez, Aspinwall and Orinoco.
  6. Name and locate the principal trade centers of the U.S.
  7. Name all the republics of Europe and give capital of each.
  8. Why is the Atlantic Coast colder than the Pacific in the same latitude?
  9. Describe the process by which the water of the ocean returns to the sources of rivers.
  10. Describe the movements of the earth. Give inclination of the earth.
It occurs to me that Salina is still a small town.....and back in 1895, it was probably smaller yet. It is reasonable to assume that it was primarily a farming/ranching economy. If you were a 19th century farmer in or near Salina, you would want to know what "climate" means, and to be able to plan strategically for its effects on your crops. If you knew the major rivers, you had more information about how to get your crop to larger markets. If you knew the names, locations, approximate elevations, and distance from you for north America's mountain ranges, you might better understand why the winds blow in one direction one part of the year, and in another direction in another part of the year, and you'd know why winds blowing out of the southwest tend to be warmer than winds blowing out of the northwest...... and what that means for your wheat crop. Not every question on that list has a direct impact on a Salina, Kansas wheat farmer, but some of it does..... and the rest of that list makes for a more well-rounded person, and a better-informed voter, who might maybe understand his nation's foreign policies better because he knows something about European republics and capitals... etc.

All I know is that when I see how badly our educational system has failed people in modern times, it makes me want to cringe. I am reminded of those "man in the street" bits that Jay Leno used to do, where he would ask passers by very simple questions about current events and such, and the degree of ignorance was shocking. THIS is the education system that produced Obama voters..........and it is no wonder at all.

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 10:28 pm
by cb1000rider
The Annoyed Man wrote: I beg to differ. I am 62, not 40, and I can still remember nearly everything I was taught in middle school geography...... and believe me, I'm not exactly a genius. I'm just teachable.
I can't remember anything about geography... Maybe the educational system did fail!

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 10:35 pm
by WildBill
It occurs to me that Salina is still a small town.....and back in 1895, it was probably smaller yet. It is reasonable to assume ...
Not your typical [Kansas] high school ... then or now.

Through the foresight and efforts of an Episcopal Bishop, the Right Reverend Elisha Smith Thomas, and a group of prominent Salina businessmen, St. John’s Military School for boys opened in 1887. These men recognized the need for a disciplined educational and living environment for young boys and established a military school to be operated under church auspices. In the more than 125 years since, St. John’s Military School for boys has helped raise young men into outstanding leaders.

http://sjms.org/military-school-for-boys/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Degradation of education

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 10:40 am
by VMI77
AndyC wrote:John Taylor Gatto - read his stuff some time.

This ^^^