Page 1 of 1

SB 179

Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 9:21 am
by txglock21
As far as I can see, this bill would change the minimum caliber of the qualifying weapon from a .38 to a .22. The only issue I have with this is from my simple-minded reading is that it say's something to the effect of "for application or renewing of a CHL". Does this mean we are going to have to go back to requalifying for our renewals? :shock:

Re: SB 179

Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 9:49 am
by AJSully421
txglock21 wrote:As far as I can see, this bill would change the minimum caliber of the qualifying weapon from a .38 to a .22. The only issue I have with this is from my simple-minded reading is that it say's something to the effect of "for application or renewing of a CHL". Does this mean we are going to have to go back to requalifying for our renewals? :shock:
It seems to me that this bill had been introduced in previous sessions and it looks like they neglected to remove that language when they tossed out renewal classes. I read nothing in SB179 that reinstates renewal classes or shooting quals.

Re: SB 179

Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:34 am
by mr1337
It will probably get substituted in committee.

Re: SB 179

Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:49 am
by joe817
mr1337 wrote:It will probably get substituted in committee.
:iagree:

Re: SB 179

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 12:34 pm
by txglock21
Wow, just passed Senate 31-0. :thumbs2:

Re: SB 179

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:55 pm
by RHenriksen
txglock21 wrote:Wow, just passed Senate 31-0. :thumbs2:
I guess so the Democrats (who all voted en block against OC & CC) can claim that they support the second amendment?

Re: SB 179

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:11 pm
by AJSully421
RHenriksen wrote:
txglock21 wrote:Wow, just passed Senate 31-0. :thumbs2:
I guess so the Democrats (who all voted en block against OC & CC) can claim that they support the second amendment?

That... and they knew it was going to pass anyway. Choose your battles.

Re: SB 179

Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:02 pm
by mr1337
AJSully421 wrote:
RHenriksen wrote:
txglock21 wrote:Wow, just passed Senate 31-0. :thumbs2:
I guess so the Democrats (who all voted en block against OC & CC) can claim that they support the second amendment?

That... and they knew it was going to pass anyway. Choose your battles.
If they know it will pass anyways, what's the down-side to voting against? I agree with RH saying it's probably so they can show that they support 2A rights.

Re: SB 179

Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:46 pm
by ELB
Well, assuming the rest of the legislative road is as smooth, if I ever have to qualify again it looks like I could use my Serbian pistol. ;-) From my OC hoster. :mrgreen: That should be interesting.