Page 1 of 1

DOD: US Constitution is sexist

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:16 am
by VMI77
http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/13/defen ... te-sexism/
The Declaration of Independence is also an historical cause of sexism, as the document refers only to ”all men” — not “men and women.”

And the Constitution, the Pentagon argues, is an historical source of sexism because “slaves and women were not included until later in history.”

Of course, members of the Armed Forces take an oath to defend the Constitution — which is, according to the DEOMI course, an “historical influence that allows sexism to continue.”
And apparently we need to stop discriminating against people based on outmoded concepts like educational standards.
The course teaches, “Individuals who have been segregated to inferior schools cannot find employment in businesses that hire according to specified credentials that inferior schools do not offer.”

Therefore, when employers institute education qualifications for prospective employees, they are engaging in a form of discrimination.
We're all racists of course too, at least if we're white males:
By an individual refusing to believe that he is inherently better off than another person as a result of his race or gender, DEOMI teaches that the individual is engaging in an act of discrimination.

Re: DOD: US Constitution is sexist

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:24 am
by C-dub
Image

Re: DOD: US Constitution is sexist

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:52 am
by VMI77
C-dub wrote:[ Image ]
It makes you wonder....have the people who write these childish interpretations of the founding documents ever read an actual history book? Not the revisionist leftist tripe foisted on unsuspecting students as history in the public schools...but some actual history? I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, and assume ignorance instead of dissimulation.....

Re: DOD: US Constitution is sexist

Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 2:22 pm
by gthaustex
VMI77 wrote:
C-dub wrote:[ Image ]
It makes you wonder....have the people who write these childish interpretations of the founding documents ever read an actual history book? Not the revisionist leftist tripe foisted on unsuspecting students as history in the public schools...but some actual history? I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, and assume ignorance instead of dissimulation.....
You are much nicer than I. :banghead: