S.B.321 (Parking Lot Bill)
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 2:40 pm
Would someone please explain to me exactly what this section of 52.061 means?
(b) Section 52.061 does not prohibit an employer from prohibiting an employee who holds a license to carry a handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, or who otherwise lawfully possesses a firearm, from possessing a firearm the employee is otherwise authorized by law to possess on the premises of the employer’s business. In this subsection, “premises” has the meaning assigned by Section 46.035(f)(3), Penal Code.
I read this as meaning an employer can prohibit an employee from possessing a firearm if they so choose and it seems to contradict the statement at the beginning 52.061,
A public or private employer may not prohibit an employee who holds a license to carry a handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, who otherwise lawfully possesses a firearm, or who lawfully possesses ammunition from transporting or storing a firearm or ammunition the employee is authorized by law to possess in a locked, privately owned motor vehicle in a parking lot, parking garage, or other parking area the employer provides for employees.
I was talking to the MSC rep. (he is a CHL’er) yesterday at my place of employment and he mentioned that he was working up a quote for both 30.06 & 30.07 (ten each) signs. I did have a talk with him about this and he informed me that he has no choice but to give them the quote which I do understand because it’s his job. I don’t have a clue where they intend on placing the signs but it wouldn’t surprise us if they were posted at the entrances to the parking lots. To answer a question that might arise from this post, one parking lot is secured and another one is not.
Would MPA come into play even for all of the CHL’ers that work here?
Thanks for ya’lls help.
(b) Section 52.061 does not prohibit an employer from prohibiting an employee who holds a license to carry a handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, or who otherwise lawfully possesses a firearm, from possessing a firearm the employee is otherwise authorized by law to possess on the premises of the employer’s business. In this subsection, “premises” has the meaning assigned by Section 46.035(f)(3), Penal Code.
I read this as meaning an employer can prohibit an employee from possessing a firearm if they so choose and it seems to contradict the statement at the beginning 52.061,
A public or private employer may not prohibit an employee who holds a license to carry a handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, who otherwise lawfully possesses a firearm, or who lawfully possesses ammunition from transporting or storing a firearm or ammunition the employee is authorized by law to possess in a locked, privately owned motor vehicle in a parking lot, parking garage, or other parking area the employer provides for employees.
I was talking to the MSC rep. (he is a CHL’er) yesterday at my place of employment and he mentioned that he was working up a quote for both 30.06 & 30.07 (ten each) signs. I did have a talk with him about this and he informed me that he has no choice but to give them the quote which I do understand because it’s his job. I don’t have a clue where they intend on placing the signs but it wouldn’t surprise us if they were posted at the entrances to the parking lots. To answer a question that might arise from this post, one parking lot is secured and another one is not.
Would MPA come into play even for all of the CHL’ers that work here?
Thanks for ya’lls help.