TexasCHLforum.com

Just went on Drudge Headline . "Mass. Democrats Qutting Dem Party"

Clicked on Guess what nothing there blank page and it has the message
I cant remember the exact wording but

no place to go..

Are the Clintons crime org and hackers after Drudge or is drduge double checking?

20,000 Massachusetts voters quit Democratic Party

https://www.google.com/search?q=Mass.+D ... 8&oe=utf-8

Sounds to me like the OLD days in Texas where one candidate in the D party was a shoo-in and folks would cross over to vote in the R primary to see that the least electable candidate in the general election would face the D party choice.

AF-Odin wrote:Sounds to me like the OLD days in Texas where one candidate in the D party was a shoo-in and folks would cross over to vote in the R primary to see that the least electable candidate in the general election would face the D party choice.

Agreed. This was my thought. Switch sides and pick the person you think is least likely to succeed in the other party's primaries.

AF-Odin wrote:Sounds to me like the OLD days in Texas where one candidate in the D party was a shoo-in and folks would cross over to vote in the R primary to see that the least electable candidate in the general election would face the D party choice.

Its probably what Odin suggests, but one can always hope its more something along the lines of:

“I didn’t leave the Democratic party, the Democratic Party left me.” ― Ronald Reagan

Similar to what was suggested in Hood County, TX.


http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/02/ ... n-primary/

I thought about doing that this year to vote for Bernie.

mojo84 wrote:Similar to what was suggested in Hood County, TX.


http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/02/ ... n-primary/

I live in Hood county and have personally met and talked to Mike Lang. He is a stand up guy with solid conservative roots and I back him 100%.
My wife and I have been reaching out for months to friends/family members here in Hood County to ensure that Lang wins.

I don't like that folks can just hop across to the other side and derail democratic process.

Mike Lang REP 20,287 53.80%

He will not have a runoff. Neither will Straus. 15,737 60.23%

I'm starting to think there may be more to this than I realized. I discounted it at first thought.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... publicans/


http://thefederalist.com/2016/03/02/sup ... be-beaten/

mojo84 wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... publicans/

Interesting,

"...a number of liberals are voting for Rubio in the hopes of embarrassing Trump...."


And yet, Trump continues to rise and win...

txgho1911 wrote:Mike Lang REP 20,287 53.80%

He will not have a runoff. Neither will Straus. 15,737 60.23%

Yes, Mike had a great night!

I read the second link. The one where the "analyst" aggregated Cruz's and Rubio's delegate count against Trump to demonstrate what? That with Cruz & Rubio's combined delegates, Trump is not unbeatable?

parabelum wrote:I read the second link. The one where the "analyst" aggregated Cruz's and Rubio's delegate count against Trump to demonstrate what? That with Cruz & Rubio's combined delegates, Trump is not unbeatable?

Are you going turn every thread into a Trump idolotrist fanboy thread? Worshipping an individual instead of agreeing on principles is not good.

Crossover voting probably has an impact on multiple candidates if it is as big as some seem to think.

mojo84 wrote:

parabelum wrote:I read the second link. The one where the "analyst" aggregated Cruz's and Rubio's delegate count against Trump to demonstrate what? That with Cruz & Rubio's combined delegates, Trump is not unbeatable?

Are youngling turn every thread into a Trump idolotrist fanboy thread? Worshipping an individual instead of agreeing on principles is not good.

Crossover voting probably has an impact on multiple candidates if it is as big as some seem to think.

One Trump fan thread is enough!