Page 1 of 3

Recounts?

Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:13 am
by TexasJohnBoy
And you thought we were done... The Russians fixed it all!

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... -wisconsin

ETA: Counterpoint http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/ ... d-n2249643

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:17 pm
by TreyHouston
Im not even going to give them (MSM) the satisfaction of clicking on these links. I get the point, media push for more drama when the drama is over. Get a life MSM. No story here

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:22 pm
by Abraham
If tears were votes, boo hoo, hoo, hoo, hooooooooooo!

Little wimpies, go to your safe space, I guess that would under the house...?

Get your favorite plush toy, lots of tissues, or heck even a blanket for your snifffle, choke, bwahaaaaa tears....

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:12 pm
by John Galt
TreyHouston wrote:Im not even going to give them (MSM) the satisfaction of clicking on these links. I get the point, media push for more drama when the drama is over. Get a life MSM. No story here
:iagree:

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:49 pm
by TexasJohnBoy
Jill Stein to save the day - without the Clinton campaign asking for it.

What a way to waste money.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/25/politics/ ... index.html
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11 ... count.html

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:14 pm
by remanifest
Interesting that she's raised over 4 million in a few days when she raised a little over 3 million during her entire campaign, and that this follows Clinton's team meeting with "experts" who say she was cheated out of votes.

This all reeks of the Hillary Clinton and her team seeking plausible deniability, not wanting to look like sore losers, and setting Jill Stein up as the fall gal. All the while, they are quietly looking to wrest the true results away from the populous, from right under our noses. I'd take this extremely seriously - it's disgusting, corrupt, and absolutely wrong on a visceral level.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:31 pm
by TexasJohnBoy
remanifest wrote:Interesting that she's raised over 4 million in a few days when she raised a little over 3 million during her entire campaign, and that this follows Clinton's team meeting with "experts" who say she was cheated out of votes.

This all reeks of the Hillary Clinton and her team seeking plausible deniability, not wanting to look like sore losers, and setting Jill Stein up as the fall gal. All the while, they are quietly looking to wrest the true results away from the populous, from right under our noses. I'd take this extremely seriously - it's disgusting, corrupt, and absolutely wrong on a visceral level.
Ding ding ding!

Just so happens that these are three states that if flipped would give her the edge. We are talking about probably 100,000 votes to be switched across the three states.

I fear to think of what protests would look like after this kind of stunt.

If I recall correctly, the Florida recounts in 2000 were over less than 1000 votes. This is insane that it's even being entertained.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 4:58 am
by BurtG
Besides the Clintons, it's also possible that George Soros financed this.
I also wonder if those three states had all the votes verified, how many bogus ones for the democrats might
be found ?

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 5:46 am
by Liberty
BurtG wrote:Besides the Clintons, it's also possible that George Soros financed this.
I also wonder if those three states had all the votes verified, how many bogus ones for the democrats might
be found ?
Soros is my guess too. What better way to weaken the country and destroy confidence in the democratic process?

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 7:25 am
by Skiprr
Liberty wrote:
BurtG wrote:Besides the Clintons, it's also possible that George Soros financed this.
I also wonder if those three states had all the votes verified, how many bogus ones for the democrats might
be found ?
Soros is my guess too. What better way to weaken the country and destroy confidence in the democratic process?
Image

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 7:52 am
by AF-Odin
Where is Al Franken with his trunk load of "uncounted ballots" that just happen to ALL be for Hillary?

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 8:13 am
by The Annoyed Man
TexasJohnBoy wrote:
remanifest wrote:Interesting that she's raised over 4 million in a few days when she raised a little over 3 million during her entire campaign, and that this follows Clinton's team meeting with "experts" who say she was cheated out of votes.

This all reeks of the Hillary Clinton and her team seeking plausible deniability, not wanting to look like sore losers, and setting Jill Stein up as the fall gal. All the while, they are quietly looking to wrest the true results away from the populous, from right under our noses. I'd take this extremely seriously - it's disgusting, corrupt, and absolutely wrong on a visceral level.
Ding ding ding!

Just so happens that these are three states that if flipped would give her the edge. We are talking about probably 100,000 votes to be switched across the three states.

I fear to think of what protests would look like after this kind of stunt.

If I recall correctly, the Florida recounts in 2000 were over less than 1000 votes. This is insane that it's even being entertained.
I heard yesterday that, in Michigan, if ALL of Stein's votes were flipped into Clinton's column, it would not overcome the numerical difference between Trump and Clinton. So for this gambit to work, the left would have to prove that all the fraudulent votes came out of the Trump column — which given the propensity for dead people and illegal aliens to vote democrat, doesn't seem likely to happen.

This is just a huge waste of taxpayer money and time, and does The People a huge disservice by injecting more fear about, and less confidence in the integrity of the electoral process.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 8:25 am
by XinTX
I also read that Stein would have no standing to call for a recount in PA. If the Dhims stole MI and WI, Trump would still win given he'd carried PA.

This is all so much drama being dredged up by the media (and probably Soros) to keep fanning the flames of the hurt feelings of the left. Lot of smoke, no flame. Not sure about the statutes in MI and WI, but some states require a recount be requested prior to the vote being certified by the Secretary of State. I think MI did that already, or at least will by Wednesday.

But it is one of those things that makes you go "hmmmm", that Stein raised more money in a few days than she had during her entire campaign.

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 8:50 am
by bblhd672
"Deplorables" stand by for action! Snowflakes prepare to run for the hills!

Re: Recounts?

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 9:17 am
by remanifest
The Annoyed Man wrote: I heard yesterday that, in Michigan, if ALL of Stein's votes were flipped into Clinton's column, it would not overcome the numerical difference between Trump and Clinton. So for this gambit to work, the left would have to prove that all the fraudulent votes came out of the Trump column — which given the propensity for dead people and illegal aliens to vote democrat, doesn't seem likely to happen.

This is just a huge waste of taxpayer money and time, and does The People a huge disservice by injecting more fear about, and less confidence in the integrity of the electoral process.
I agree with the sentiments about this doing the people a huge disservice. In Michigan, because they don't have electronic voting machines, they would simply need to "find" a bunch of ballots. I'm not putting it beyond these crooks, despite the fact that there have already been multiple counts of the vote in Michigan.

For Wisconsin & Pennsylvania, the Clinton team meeting with "scientists", who point out anomalies in the results -- anomalies which only occurred in states that Clinton lost, indicates that the stage is being set for a snatch & grab by the globalists. Consider that each vote should be counted as a whole integer. If the "experts" found that a fraction of Trump votes included fractional accounting (true or not), they'd make an adjustment to the accounting to swing it in favor of Clinton.

I hope I'm wrong about this. If not, hold on to your seats - it's going to be a bumpy ride.