President Donald Trump Press Conference (2/16/2017)
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:54 pm
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
The Annoyed Man wrote:They spent the last 6 months comparing him to Hitler, and they thought he hadn't noticed?
I'm enjoying the heck out of seeing them put in their place. When the 4th Estate has become the 5th Column, it's time to treat them like a 5th Column, and not the 4th Estate. He owes them nothing. They've been nothing but partisan hacks, and they've thrown their professionalism out the window - if they ever had any to begin with.
Maybe once they come to realize that he's not going to give them a thing until they regain their professionalism, they'll regain their professionalism. Then his news conferences will be much less confrontational.
If I were him, I would add one other feature to his management of the press......... You publish something given to you by a leaker, you get frozen out. You get invited back in after publishing a front page op-ed acknowledging your wrong, and saying that you'll do better going forward.
If the leak is something that NEEDS to be leaked because it protects the republic to leak it, particularly if The People are aroused into demanding action, then the press will close ranks, and the polls will reflect The People's support of the press. The president will alter course.
But it is obvious right now that Trump is talking directly to The People, shutting the press out of the loop. Rassmussen has Trump at 55%. His tactic is working, and the press will eventually change tactic or die.
:iagree:Ah yes, so the press can be useful as a leak reporter.The Annoyed Man wrote: If the leak is something that NEEDS to be leaked because it protects the republic to leak it, particularly if The People are aroused into demanding action, then the press will close ranks, and the polls will reflect The People's support of the press. The president will alter course.
Thank you for trying to twist my meaning into implying something I did not say.dale blanker wrote::iagree:Ah yes, so the press can be useful as a leak reporter.The Annoyed Man wrote: If the leak is something that NEEDS to be leaked because it protects the republic to leak it, particularly if The People are aroused into demanding action, then the press will close ranks, and the polls will reflect The People's support of the press. The president will alter course.
That possibility distinguishes our system from the authoritarian ones. Let's not lose sight of that benefit and dismiss the press completely.
I don't see much difference between Nixon's Deep Throat and Flynn's. In both cases, the press received confidential info from the Intelligence community and as a result there was at least one less lier in the White House. It seems to me that the leak and the subsequent reporting did the Vice President a favor and, I hope, the President too.The Annoyed Man wrote:Thank you for trying to twist my meaning into implying something I did not say.dale blanker wrote::iagree:Ah yes, so the press can be useful as a leak reporter.The Annoyed Man wrote: If the leak is something that NEEDS to be leaked because it protects the republic to leak it, particularly if The People are aroused into demanding action, then the press will close ranks, and the polls will reflect The People's support of the press. The president will alter course.
That possibility distinguishes our system from the authoritarian ones. Let's not lose sight of that benefit and dismiss the press completely.
Deep Throat did the nation a service. NONE of what the press is doing to Trump today rises to that level.
Amen. TAM, BTW, I have it on good authority that CERN is closing its particle accelerator as no longer cost-effective. It seems they have discovered an origin of particle acceleration that, over the past three months, has become a sustained source of rotational forces even greater than the Large Hadron Collider.The Annoyed Man wrote:What Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward did took tremendous courage. What these addled farts-for-brains are doing today doesn't even come close. Bernstein and Woodward elevated their profession, and the American People responded accordingly. What the cretins of the MSM today are doing debases the press, and guess what....... the people are responding accordingly, and no longer trust the "news" media. They have themselves to blame.
There's a lot more. The nation's media haven't behaved honorably and truthfully since Reagan was President. They are now reaping the full measure of the public's disdain which they sowed for themselves over the past 30+ years.I once watched an American president stand on a press conference stage and say (with a straight face) that American surgeons were cutting out people’s tonsils based on pay charts. AND NO ONE QUESTIONED IT! I was like, “WHAT?!?! They’re doing what?!?! Is that true!?!?” I’d actually still like to know.
If what (then) president Barack Obama said in that press conference was true, it would’ve been the biggest medical scandal in American history.
But instead of someone standing up and asking what I was yelling at the the TV screen, “Mr president, are you asserting that there is a systematic and concerted effort by American surgeons to mutilate people for money?” it was just taken for granted to be true and everyone went about their business. Really?
This was part of President Obama’s pitch to the American people for the ACA. And instead of journalistic curiosity, we got compliance and even complicity. And Mr Obama got press questions like, “what has been the most enchanting part of the presidency for you, so far?” Again …really?
If you watched (NOW) president Donald Trump’s recent press conference and got clammy hands and heart palpitations, fearing the free world is in jeopardy, I understand. But if you couldn’t see how someone would be standing up cheering it on …then you have no idea what’s happening right now. And what’s BEEN happening for a while. Clearly, a lot of people don’t.
The press hasn’t done its job. We all know which side everyone is on. It’s just that one side refuses to be honest with us. George Stephanopoulos is a Democrat operative. We all know this. He has talked openly about being on strategy calls with Democrats right before going to air. That’s fine, George. But just admit it. Don’t try to sell me on your “objectivity.” Sean Hannity may be a tool, but he is at least being honest about who he is.
All emphasis above is mine.HH: Well, he [Trump] did. He made some incredible misstatements yesterday about, for example, the largest victory. And I just played Jake Tapper running through them, and it upsets people like you and me who are used to being held accountable for every word we say on the air, on this show, on your show. We’re always, you know, if we get something wrong, we have to correct it. He never corrects anything that he says, and he says lots of wrong things. But that one comment, they don’t trust you anymore, is a summation of where we are in America, because I really do think Manhattan-Beltway elites have lost the country. They’ve lost it. There’s just no confidence in, I’m not going to say us, because I am neither in nor of the Beltway-Manhattan media elite. I live in California still. But what do you think of that? Is it true?
JD: Well, yes. I mean, yes, it’s true, and it’s not because of anything obviously Donald Trump did. The press did all that good work ruining its reputation on its own, and we can have a long conversation about what created that. Part of it, though, is what you mentioned about the local weather report, which is to say a lot of hysterical coverage about every little last thing that doesn’t warrant it. Having said that, it doesn’t mean, and in fact, it most explicitly does not mean that the press just throws out the standards.
If I may be permitted a little puffery, I present you with http://www.annoyedman.com.G26ster wrote:TAM, you really need your own blog! Your writing is right up there with what journalism should be - the complete and unvarnished truth.
Who knew? Not me. Good work!The Annoyed Man wrote:If I may be permitted a little puffery, I present you with http://www.annoyedman.com.G26ster wrote:TAM, you really need your own blog! Your writing is right up there with what journalism should be - the complete and unvarnished truth.