TPC CH9 Use of Force
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:40 am
Anyone know of the definition or case law for "and with force entered"? Does it mean they had to break something to get in? Or is turning a door knob/pulling a car door handle considered "force"? Is only walking through an open door considered not using force?
I know you could still be found reasonable by a jury if someone attempted to open your car door (let's say unlocked) and you used force to deter them under 9.31 (a) without the subsections, but you might not have the automatic "presumed reasonable" defense.
I know you could still be found reasonable by a jury if someone attempted to open your car door (let's say unlocked) and you used force to deter them under 9.31 (a) without the subsections, but you might not have the automatic "presumed reasonable" defense.
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE. (a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
(1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used:
(A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment;
(B) unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor's habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or
(C) was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery;