The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
6.3 - 8 GhZ radio signals through multiple antennas. The maximum band range is 3.3-10 GhZ. They match their inbound signals to pre-programmed weapon profiles. The device can also scan face images to identify specific individuals.crazy2medic wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 8:41 am Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't need to Emit in order to detect? If so what are they bombarding your body with?
Kinda the whole device in a nutshell wouldn't you say?the system intentionally prohibits any features, which could be exploited to invade privacy.
Yep, and I'm certain it's hack-proof.RogueUSMC wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:09 amKinda the whole device in a nutshell wouldn't you say?the system intentionally prohibits any features, which could be exploited to invade privacy.
That was my thought. They will waste a lot of money on me, since they shouldn't need a smartphone to detect my gun.flechero wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:11 amYep, and I'm certain it's hack-proof.RogueUSMC wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:09 amKinda the whole device in a nutshell wouldn't you say?the system intentionally prohibits any features, which could be exploited to invade privacy.
On the other hand, if everyone OC'd this wouldn't matter.
Considering the fact that it has facial recognition software you could tie it into the federal 'Real ID' database and if someone doesn't appear in it but does appear in the drivers license database (Some states like our neighbor to the west, NM, issue drivers licenses to illegals that are not valid for federal ID purposes) and you should have probable cause to check immigration status...ELB wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:23 am If you could lead people to believe that with a small tweak this could detect illegal immigrants it would be banned in gun-phobic states in a heartbeat.
New market niche: jammers.
So could you have a counter emitter that sends the same frequency and blanks out what they are sending?DocV wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:04 am6.3 - 8 GhZ radio signals through multiple antennas. The maximum band range is 3.3-10 GhZ. They match their inbound signals to pre-programmed weapon profiles. The device can also scan face images to identify specific individuals.crazy2medic wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 8:41 am Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't need to Emit in order to detect? If so what are they bombarding your body with?
In a police state, there is zero expectation of privacy.RogueUSMC wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:09 amKinda the whole device in a nutshell wouldn't you say?the system intentionally prohibits any features, which could be exploited to invade privacy.
Barry is the CEO of Royal Holdings; he leads new business and new solution development as well as group marketing.
Barry founded TerrorMate, the world's first terror and mass shooting alert mobile app. He is a former intelligence contractor with expertise in sanction busting, narcotics, narco-terror groups, and smuggling syndicates in the Middle East, and he has worked with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force, Belgium Customs Intelligence Agency, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs Intelligence, and the U.S. Department of Defense Criminal Investigation Service (DCIS). Barry is the author of the Amazon best seller The Black Market Concierge.
I'd say, in public, there is no expectation of privacy. And you regularly sign away your privacy in your own home.bblhd672 wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:39 amIn a police state, there is zero expectation of privacy.RogueUSMC wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:09 amKinda the whole device in a nutshell wouldn't you say?the system intentionally prohibits any features, which could be exploited to invade privacy.
https://www.royalholdings.org/teamBarry is the CEO of Royal Holdings; he leads new business and new solution development as well as group marketing.
Barry founded TerrorMate, the world's first terror and mass shooting alert mobile app. He is a former intelligence contractor with expertise in sanction busting, narcotics, narco-terror groups, and smuggling syndicates in the Middle East, and he has worked with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force, Belgium Customs Intelligence Agency, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs Intelligence, and the U.S. Department of Defense Criminal Investigation Service (DCIS). Barry is the author of the Amazon best seller The Black Market Concierge.
There is an expectation of not being searched without consent or a warrant. Scanning and finding what is in my pockets and under my clothes is not something that is out in public view. I do expect what I have concealed in my pockets and under my close to stay private.chamberc wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 12:25 pmI'd say, in public, there is no expectation of privacy. And you regularly sign away your privacy in your own home.bblhd672 wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:39 amIn a police state, there is zero expectation of privacy.RogueUSMC wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:09 amKinda the whole device in a nutshell wouldn't you say?the system intentionally prohibits any features, which could be exploited to invade privacy.
https://www.royalholdings.org/teamBarry is the CEO of Royal Holdings; he leads new business and new solution development as well as group marketing.
Barry founded TerrorMate, the world's first terror and mass shooting alert mobile app. He is a former intelligence contractor with expertise in sanction busting, narcotics, narco-terror groups, and smuggling syndicates in the Middle East, and he has worked with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force, Belgium Customs Intelligence Agency, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs Intelligence, and the U.S. Department of Defense Criminal Investigation Service (DCIS). Barry is the author of the Amazon best seller The Black Market Concierge.
Article [IV] (Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure)
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
True, but the government will say it is free to send and receive radio waves.mojo84 wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 12:54 pmThere is an expectation of not being searched without consent or a warrant. Scanning and finding what is in my pockets and under my clothes is not something that is out in public view. I do expect what I have concealed in my pockets and under my close to stay private.chamberc wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 12:25 pmI'd say, in public, there is no expectation of privacy. And you regularly sign away your privacy in your own home.bblhd672 wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 11:39 amIn a police state, there is zero expectation of privacy.RogueUSMC wrote: Thu Aug 23, 2018 9:09 amKinda the whole device in a nutshell wouldn't you say?the system intentionally prohibits any features, which could be exploited to invade privacy.
https://www.royalholdings.org/teamBarry is the CEO of Royal Holdings; he leads new business and new solution development as well as group marketing.
Barry founded TerrorMate, the world's first terror and mass shooting alert mobile app. He is a former intelligence contractor with expertise in sanction busting, narcotics, narco-terror groups, and smuggling syndicates in the Middle East, and he has worked with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force, Belgium Customs Intelligence Agency, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs Intelligence, and the U.S. Department of Defense Criminal Investigation Service (DCIS). Barry is the author of the Amazon best seller The Black Market Concierge.
Article [IV] (Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure)
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.