Page 1 of 2
Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 11:39 am
by Gator Guy
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate ... d-abortion
"Senate Democrats just voted against legislation to prevent the killing of newborn infant children," Trump wrote. "The Democrat position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth."
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 1:39 pm
by philip964
I’m now hearing abortion up to 24 months.
Too many people in prison for murdering their children, especially boyfriends who should have a choice too.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 2:30 pm
by OneGun
philip964 wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2019 1:39 pm
I’m now hearing abortion up to 24 months.
Too many people in prison for murdering their children, especially boyfriends who should have a choice too.
Why not 29 years?? I can think of a NYC congress person ......
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 2:40 pm
by The Annoyed Man
While I absolutely agree with the OP here, maybe we should all remember forum rule #11:
11. Off-topic posts/threads: Since they tend to cause the most problems for other boards, our "off-topic" sub-forum is not an "anything goes" area. Absolutely no discussions of immigration/border security, abortion, race matters, or any other hot-button political issues. (Gun-related political issues can be discussed in the Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues forum.)
Not everybody on this forum agrees with our position, and this should not be a wedge issue that will divide gun owners.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 2:52 pm
by jason812
That's not a forum violation because it's not discussing abortion.
Abortion = murdering a baby before birth.
At 24 months old, it's murdering a toddler.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 3:34 pm
by The Annoyed Man
jason812 wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2019 2:52 pm
That's not a forum violation because it's not discussing abortion.
Abortion = murdering a baby before birth.
At 24 months old, it's murdering a toddler.
Look, I agree with you. But, the OP's article wasn't about murdering 24 month old infants - although that is the logical extension of what the dems are doing. The article was about killing newborns that survive abortion....
also an abomination. I have said repeatedly that the DNC is a death cult, and abortion their most sacred sacrament. BUT... the rules are the rules.
Anyway, I just wanted to issue a caution. I don't think the subject should be off the table, but according to the rules, it is. I don't think it should become an argument between us, because there really isn't one. We agree.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 4:00 pm
by montgomery
The Annoyed Man wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2019 3:34 pm
jason812 wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2019 2:52 pm
That's not a forum violation because it's not discussing abortion.
Abortion = murdering a baby before birth.
At 24 months old, it's murdering a toddler.
Look, I agree with you. But, the OP's article wasn't about murdering 24 month old infants - although that is the logical extension of what the dems are doing. The article was about killing newborns that survive abortion....
also an abomination. I have said repeatedly that the DNC is a death cult, and abortion their most sacred sacrament. BUT... the rules are the rules.
Anyway, I just wanted to issue a caution. I don't think the subject should be off the table, but according to the rules, it is. I don't think it should become an argument between us, because there really isn't one. We agree.
Not a gun issue. Focus.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 4:35 pm
by Soccerdad1995
Framing this as an abortion issue is not only inaccurate, but also a mistake, IMHO. "A newborn that survives an abortion" is a human being. And just like every other human being, they are endowed by their creator with the right to life, among other things. This has nothing to do with abortion. It's about whether we allow one human being to legally kill another human being.
Personally, I vote no on killing anyone else who is not threatening to harm you in any way. I think that should be illegal. It is truly sad that our lawmakers do not agree with me on this.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 4:46 pm
by WTR
How can it be legal to murder a baby born alive yet if you kill a pregnant woman you are charged with two murders ?
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 4:50 pm
by rotor
I wonder if the baby is granted a birth certificate.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 6:06 pm
by imkopaka
I agree with TAM - this is going to get locked. While many of us (I would argue most of us) on here agree with you Gator, this appears to violate forum rules.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 6:08 pm
by C-dub
IBTL
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 6:46 pm
by anygunanywhere
Me too.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 7:32 pm
by philip964
WTR wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2019 4:46 pm
How can it be legal to murder a baby born alive yet if you kill a pregnant woman you are charged with two murders ?
It’s no longer the case in New York. They celebrated it by lighting up the freedom tower in honor of the new law.
If a baby can live outside the womb. It’s very thin ice that I think will drown the Dems in 2020.
Re: Not her body? Still her choice!
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 11:40 pm
by philip964
Meme I saw today:
When Jesus was a baby,
Satan prompted the government to murder babies.
Different government, same old demons.
This is more than politics.