Governor Abbott Signs Ten Pro-Second Amendment Bills into Law
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:00 pm
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
I've been promoting that for years, but it gets no traction.anygunanywhere wrote: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:25 pm So the state can limit liability if businesses don’t post. How about making businesses that post liable? Maybe next session.
Thanks Charles.Charles L. Cotton wrote: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:50 pmI've been promoting that for years, but it gets no traction.anygunanywhere wrote: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:25 pm So the state can limit liability if businesses don’t post. How about making businesses that post liable? Maybe next session.
Chas.
That's because it makes sense!Charles L. Cotton wrote: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:50 pmI've been promoting that for years, but it gets no traction.anygunanywhere wrote: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:25 pm So the state can limit liability if businesses don’t post. How about making businesses that post liable? Maybe next session.
Chas.
https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Hi ... ill=HB1791chasfm11 wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 7:41 am So what is the outcome of House Bill 1791? Will it have any real impact on the local government and associated groups hanging signs?
The bill's a good thing, but I doubt it will reach signs such as those universally posted by the City of San Antonio. Paraphrasing, they say carrying is banned unless otherwise authorized by law. That leaves you to figure out what the city might be doing in this place that could cause an exception to apply.chasfm11 wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 7:41 am So what is the outcome of House Bill 1791? Will it have any real impact on the local government and associated groups hanging signs?
Those who would seize our rights are tenacious at all levels. Somehow, we have to figure out how to break the stranglehold that they have on our largest cities.KLB wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:59 amThe bill's a good thing, but I doubt it will reach signs such as those universally posted by the City of San Antonio. Paraphrasing, they say carrying is banned unless otherwise authorized by law. That leaves you to figure out what the city might be doing in this place that could cause an exception to apply.chasfm11 wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 7:41 am So what is the outcome of House Bill 1791? Will it have any real impact on the local government and associated groups hanging signs?
Keeping the citizenry in doubt about their rights is a feature, not a bug, of San Antonio's governing philosophy.
really surprised Hughes put his name on anything. He is our guy both as a rep and now as a senator. cant believe he keeps getting re-elected. he is specialTreyHouston wrote: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:47 pm House Bill 1177 by Rep. Dade Phelan (R-Beaumont) & Sen. Brandon Creighton (R-Conroe) protects citizens from being charged with a crime for carrying a handgun without a License To Carry while evacuating from an area during a declared state or local disaster, or while returning to that area, and allows shelters which are otherwise prohibited locations to decide whether to accommodate evacuees with firearms in their possession.
And
Senate Bill 772 by Sen. Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola) & Rep. Drew Springer (R-Muenster) provides civil liability protection to business establishments which choose not to post 30.06/30.07 signs, making them less vulnerable to frivolous lawsuits and giving them an incentive to adopt permissive policies for the carrying of handguns by law-abiding citizens on their premises.
I like those two!!