OCT activists suing DPS

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

cb1000rider
Senior Member
Posts: 2505
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:27 pm

Re: OCT activists suing DPS

Post by cb1000rider »

jmra wrote:If CJ was involved there must be video.
To prove his innocence? It's kinda funny that this is what video has become these days in a country where we should be innocent until proven guilty. The video would certainly apply to resisting arrest, but what authority does the DPS have to demand that an individual or group disperse from the steps of the capital as long as the assembly is peaceful?

The steps of the capital are as much a protected speech zone as flying a flag in your front yard is. Again, I don't approve of OCT tactics, but in *my* view, carrying a plastic (blue) gun in a holster there is very much political speech. I don't think that the same protections should apply at Starbucks, but the steps of the capital should be protected... even if those actions or political views are such that we don't agree with them.
User avatar
Glockster
Senior Member
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: OCT activists suing DPS

Post by Glockster »

cb1000rider wrote:
jmra wrote:If CJ was involved there must be video.
To prove his innocence? It's kinda funny that this is what video has become these days in a country where we should be innocent until proven guilty. The video would certainly apply to resisting arrest, but what authority does the DPS have to demand that an individual or group disperse from the steps of the capital as long as the assembly is peaceful?

The steps of the capital are as much a protected speech zone as flying a flag in your front yard is. Again, I don't approve of OCT tactics, but in *my* view, carrying a plastic (blue) gun in a holster there is very much political speech. I don't think that the same protections should apply at Starbucks, but the steps of the capital should be protected... even if those actions or political views are such that we don't agree with them.

:iagree:
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?
User avatar
jmra
Senior Member
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: OCT activists suing DPS

Post by jmra »

cb1000rider wrote:
jmra wrote:If CJ was involved there must be video.
To prove his innocence? It's kinda funny that this is what video has become these days in a country where we should be innocent until proven guilty. The video would certainly apply to resisting arrest, but what authority does the DPS have to demand that an individual or group disperse from the steps of the capital as long as the assembly is peaceful?

The steps of the capital are as much a protected speech zone as flying a flag in your front yard is. Again, I don't approve of OCT tactics, but in *my* view, carrying a plastic (blue) gun in a holster there is very much political speech. I don't think that the same protections should apply at Starbucks, but the steps of the capital should be protected... even if those actions or political views are such that we don't agree with them.
I wasn't commenting on guilt or innocence, just that we seem to see a lot of video of CJ - enough video that I would bet there's a video of this event.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
cb1000rider
Senior Member
Posts: 2505
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:27 pm

Re: OCT activists suing DPS

Post by cb1000rider »

I completely agree with that... He's an agitator and without a camera things will probably go "worse" for him than they already have.
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”