Interesting story on KXAS channel 5 this morning

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

BrassMonkey
Senior Member
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: North of Mckinney

Post by BrassMonkey »

That clip has Lynn Kuwano. It is also nto last nights story at around the ummm, 18:30 hour? In this newer report, they are talking about an ak-47 and uzi? The last one I saw yesterday late afternoon talked about a high power deer rifle and a S&W revolver and a shoulder fired greande launcher. Don't you just hate it when people (news stations included) report based off of partial or inaccurate info? But you can't fault them too bad for it, they are reporting what they know to be true...


Jason73 wrote:According to Fox 4 News the weapons were perfectly legal:

DALLAS -- The man who's downtown Dallas apartment was raided in a weapons seizure Wednesday has not been charged with any crime. Investigators say it appears all of the guns and ammunition are legal and a shoulder fired rocket launcher may only get him a citation. FOX 4's Emily Lopez has details.

you can watch the video here:

http://www.myfoxdfw.com/myfox/pages/New ... geId=3.2.1

So what if the guy had a grenade launcher, I know people who own similar surplus military hardware and its all legal. of course it has all been rendered inoperable, but they own the pieces for historical purposes.
BrassMonkey, that funky monkey....
===========================
Springfield TRP
Glock 22
Glock 21
Walther P22
BrassMonkey
Senior Member
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: North of Mckinney

Post by BrassMonkey »

What's the eyeroll for?
txinvestigator wrote:
BrassMonkey wrote:I was being fasichious(sp? No time for the dictionary at the moment) I was stretching the truth and known facts like the media does... I guess I was trying to make a point by acting like they do...
txinvestigator wrote:
hi-power wrote:
txinvestigator wrote:Remember that the media is notorious for mis-reporting. We really have no idea how this went down.
BrassMonkey wrote:He shoulda lived in Wylie. He would have gotten away with it then...
txinvestigator wrote:How do you figure?
BrassMonkey wrote:Cause John Roach is afraid to procesute kiddie porn people.
txinvestigator wrote:Your evidence of that is what?
BrassMonkey wrote:News reports...
Now that's funny! I don't care who you are. :lol:

My .02 is that the news media ALWAYS distorts news reports when guns are involved, in an attempt to hype boring news and get people to read or watch. They're not called the "drive-by" media for nothing.
LOL

I am making a point that we need to be careful about spouting off that which we know little, if not nothing, about.

I KNOW the case he is referring to is the one in MURPHY, not WYLIE, where child PREDITORS, not PORNOGRAPHERS or CONSUMERS, were arrested in a sting set up by a TV NEWS CREW using the local police without the knowledge of the COUNTY attorney of Collin County.

During that sting, a DA from another county failed to show for the meet in Murphy, so the news crew and police when to that DA's house, where that DA proceeded to shoot himself.

Collin County DA Roach refused to prosecute the cases. It appears that our Monkey believes that means that child porn users in Wylie won't be prosecuted.

I would like BrassMonkey to tell me how he thinks those pedophiles "got away with it" and how that is the fault of the DA.
Sure; :roll:
BrassMonkey, that funky monkey....
===========================
Springfield TRP
Glock 22
Glock 21
Walther P22
Renegade

Re: Interesting story on KXAS channel 5 this morning

Post by Renegade »

RCP wrote:Let me start by saying that I am glad the guy was caught if he indeed is in possession of child pornography.
They were wrong on the guns, they are probably wrong on the child porn. I mean really, how hard is to ID child porn?
BrassMonkey
Senior Member
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: North of Mckinney

Re: Interesting story on KXAS channel 5 this morning

Post by BrassMonkey »

lol, been exposed to alot of it have ya? jk, I agree...
Renegade wrote:
RCP wrote:Let me start by saying that I am glad the guy was caught if he indeed is in possession of child pornography.
They were wrong on the guns, they are probably wrong on the child porn. I mean really, how hard is to ID child porn?
BrassMonkey, that funky monkey....
===========================
Springfield TRP
Glock 22
Glock 21
Walther P22
badkarma56
Senior Member
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:10 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Post by badkarma56 »

hi-power wrote:I was also wondering why the police sought a search warrant just for guns until I got to the part about the grenade launcher!

That's a show stopper right there.
Dude, you mean I can't legally have a grenade launcher in my house :shock: ...uh, excuse me, I'll be right back...
;-)
Online CHL App Completed: 25JUN07
CHL App Packet Received from DPS: 29JUN07
CHL Class: 7JUL07
CHL App Sent to DPS: 9JUL07
DPS Received CHL App: 12JUL07
DPS "Processing App": 25JUL07
DPS "App Completed": 15AUG07
CHL In-Hand: 17AUG07
BrassMonkey
Senior Member
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: North of Mckinney

Post by BrassMonkey »

lol, I wanna try it...
BrassMonkey, that funky monkey....
===========================
Springfield TRP
Glock 22
Glock 21
Walther P22
KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

Post by KD5NRH »

BrassMonkey wrote:lol, I wanna try it...
Child porn or the grenade launcher? :shock:

But for the previous poster, it can be fairly hard to ID child porn in some cases; I used to work for an internet provider, and one of my occasional tasks was to be the liaison to law enforcement when we ran across stuff like that. There were times when we were sure we had given them enough to nail someone dead to rights, and it would turn out that the model was extremely young-looking, but legal.
BrassMonkey
Senior Member
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: North of Mckinney

Post by BrassMonkey »

Dood, the grenade launcher...
KD5NRH wrote:
BrassMonkey wrote:lol, I wanna try it...
Child porn or the grenade launcher? :shock:

But for the previous poster, it can be fairly hard to ID child porn in some cases; I used to work for an internet provider, and one of my occasional tasks was to be the liaison to law enforcement when we ran across stuff like that. There were times when we were sure we had given them enough to nail someone dead to rights, and it would turn out that the model was extremely young-looking, but legal.
BrassMonkey, that funky monkey....
===========================
Springfield TRP
Glock 22
Glock 21
Walther P22
User avatar
Skiprr
Moderator
Posts: 6458
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: Outskirts of Houston

Re: weapons caches

Post by Skiprr »

Rex B wrote:"...over 1000 rounds of ammunition.."
Well, that right there is a crime. How could any self-respecting citizen let himself run so low on ammo?
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
barnez
Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 11:04 am
Location: Paris

Post by barnez »

hi-power wrote:My .02 is that the news media ALWAYS distorts news reports when guns are involved, in an attempt to hype boring news and get people to read or watch. They're not called the "drive-by" media for nothing.
that is SOOOO true. when the shaquanda cotton hooplah was going on a block away from my house i was AMAZED by how inaccurate the national media reports were. it was mostly the facts of the case but some of it was even the day of the week or names of the people involved. i really think they were getting their info from blogs written by people that had never set a foot in Paris, Texas.
NRA EPL Lifetime Member
dihappy
Senior Member
Posts: 907
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: San Antonio

Post by dihappy »

hi-power wrote:Image (Now with gun-related goodness!)
Sorry but she looks like any other cute anchor out there.
Image
govnor
Senior Member
Posts: 475
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 8:47 pm
Location: Bedford, Texas

Post by govnor »

The disturbing thing about this case is that the guy had some legal assault rifles in his home and that was the basis to bring down the goon squad. Now, if the maintenance man had seen some child porn and reported it, that is totally different. It seems like that was found on video tapes as a result of the gun search. At least that's what I heard on the radio.

In any case, if the police went in for a warrant for guns and found the child porn, I don't think the guy could be prosecuted for it. It would be an illegal search at that point. Or evidence garnered without a search warrant for it or whatever.

I could be wrong about this, but I don't think I am. People get away with crimes all the time because of search and seizure laws. If the guy really had child porn then he deserves to go down to Huntsville with his good roomate, bubba.
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."- George Orwell

NRA member!
BrassMonkey
Senior Member
Posts: 993
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: North of Mckinney

Post by BrassMonkey »

Ever seen her in pigtails? :cool:
dihappy wrote:
hi-power wrote:Image (Now with gun-related goodness!)
Sorry but she looks like any other cute anchor out there.
BrassMonkey, that funky monkey....
===========================
Springfield TRP
Glock 22
Glock 21
Walther P22
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”