Glock 19 since 2001, considering P229

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
zatoman
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:26 pm

Glock 19 since 2001, considering P229

Post by zatoman »

My first semi-auto pistol was a Glock 19, early Gen 3. I love it and it has shot thousands of holes in paper with no problems. It is my current carry gun.

I'm getting the itch to buy a new carry gun. Considering a P229. I'm interested in hearing from anyone who has gone from a Glock 19 to a Sig P229.

Better? Worse? The same?
User avatar
carlson1
Moderator
Posts: 11865
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Glock 19 since 2001, considering P229

Post by carlson1 »

Both great guns. The Sig will be heavier because of the frame not being polymer. It will be a little more bulky if you get the one with a rail. You might look into a Sig P228 or the M11-A1. They are 9mm only and have no rail. They are a little heavier, but not bulky.

I left the Glock and went back to Sigs a few years ago. I like both, but I like the Sig a little better. It is also always a great reason just to had another firearm.
Image
parabelum
Senior Member
Posts: 2717
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:22 pm

Re: Glock 19 since 2001, considering P229

Post by parabelum »

I'm partial to Glocks but 229 is a nice gun.
I tried it out for few months, but I just couldn't get adjusted to the trigger.

If you go for 229, be sure you squeeze off several hundred rounds thru the pipe before you carry, to get adjusted to the trigger difference.

That is of course unless you are already familiar with it. :tiphat:
User avatar
carlson1
Moderator
Posts: 11865
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Glock 19 since 2001, considering P229

Post by carlson1 »

parabelum wrote:I'm partial to Glocks but 229 is a nice gun.
I tried it out for few months, but I just couldn't get adjusted to the trigger.

If you go for 229, be sure you squeeze off several hundred rounds thru the pipe before you carry, to get adjusted to the trigger difference.

That is of course unless you are already familiar with it. :tiphat:
Trigger is different. I suggest the extra shooting, but I also suggest more like everyday for 5 or 10 minutes dry fire and dry fire. The first pull is double action and it takes a lot of getting used to as parabelum said.
Image
dhoobler
Senior Member
Posts: 490
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:58 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX

Re: Glock 19 since 2001, considering P229

Post by dhoobler »

If you get a Sig, get one with a short reset trigger. I have an M11-A1. It comes with the SRT, night sights and three mags. I highly recommend it.

One caveat, the Sigs with the E2 frame (M11-A1,P229 with 15 round mags) are a bit difficult to find holsters for.
Revolver - An elegant weapon... for a more civilized age.
NRA Endowment Life Member
TSRA Life Member
rentz
Senior Member
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 9:16 am
Location: DFW

Re: Glock 19 since 2001, considering P229

Post by rentz »

like said above its going to be heavier, but like you i find i shoot sigs (and hk) more accurately than glocks.

one thing i could suggest is search for an LEO tradein 229 you can find them at fairly decent prices and if you get a .40 it can shoot any of .357 or 9mm with conversion barrels.
jb2012
Senior Member
Posts: 1055
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 1:12 pm

Re: Glock 19 since 2001, considering P229

Post by jb2012 »

Well I think you ought to look at the sig 1911's! Haha :biggrinjester:
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”