This wins the internet tonight

TexasTornado · Post by **TexasTornado** » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:41 pm

Found on a fox news Facebook post

"The police officer said he warned the drunk woman to stop eating his fries or she'd be arrested for stealing. After she took fries from him a third time, she found out he wasn't kidding."

Take Down Sicko · Post by **Take Down Sicko** » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:00 pm

She must have wanted to be thrown in the slammer by the sound of it.

The Wall · Post by **The Wall** » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:17 pm

She could have been flirting.

TexasTornado · Post by **TexasTornado** » Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:29 pm

The Wall wrote:She could have been flirting.

if she was trying to flirt she was doing it ALL wrong. You flirt by GIVING a man food...NOT by taking it away

rtschl · Post by **rtschl** » Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:45 pm

TexasTornado wrote:
The Wall wrote:She could have been flirting.
if she was trying to flirt she was doing it ALL wrong. You flirt by GIVING a man food...NOT by taking it away

Until you're married, then they just want "a" bite of yours instead of ordering it for themselves.

XinTX · Post by **XinTX** » Sat Sep 10, 2016 3:13 am

At least she wasn't stealing bacon. That would result in an arrest without a warning.

And rightly so.

Liberty · Post by **Liberty** » Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:56 am

French fries are sort of meant to be shared. But if she had stolen his donut, that's a different story.

TexasTornado · Post by **TexasTornado** » Sat Sep 10, 2016 7:48 am

rtschl wrote:
TexasTornado wrote:
The Wall wrote:She could have been flirting.
if she was trying to flirt she was doing it ALL wrong. You flirt by GIVING a man food...NOT by taking it away
Until you're married, then they just want "a" bite of yours instead of ordering it for themselves.

Well once you're married.... have you ever heard the saying, "what's mine is mine, what's his is mine"?

The Annoyed Man · Post by **The Annoyed Man** » Sat Sep 10, 2016 7:57 am

XinTX wrote:At least she wasn't stealing bacon. That would result in an arrest without a warning.

And rightly so.

That would have actually justified a shooting, not just an arrest.

Jusme · Post by **Jusme** » Sat Sep 10, 2016 8:56 am

The Annoyed Man wrote:
XinTX wrote:At least she wasn't stealing bacon. That would result in an arrest without a warning.

And rightly so.
That would have actually justified a shooting, not just an arrest.

Exactly, deadly force in defense of bacon, will be an automatic no bill.

The Annoyed Man · Post by **The Annoyed Man** » Sat Sep 10, 2016 9:02 am

Jusme wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
XinTX wrote:At least she wasn't stealing bacon. That would result in an arrest without a warning.
And rightly so.
That would have actually justified a shooting, not just an arrest.
Exactly, deadly force in defense of bacon, will be an automatic no bill.

......unless the prosecutor or judge is either an observant Muslim or observant Jew, in which case, you might be able to obtain a recusal or successful appeal on 1st Amendment grounds.

(And I apologize if I offended. I meant no offense to either Muslims or Jews, but c'mon! The bacon joke was too good to pass up!!!

)

Pawpaw · Post by **Pawpaw** » Sat Sep 10, 2016 9:10 am

It's also possible the judge could be a pig... er... uh... Hillary supporter!

TexasCHLforum.com

This wins the internet tonight

This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight

Re: This wins the internet tonight