SewTexas wrote:ELB wrote:Tantrums of a spoiled child who did not get his way.
it's starting to look like it, isn't it?
was there ever any proof offered that they actually did it? if so, I missed it.
the lefts own statements prove its a lie.
hacking an election is done for what reason? to change the vote so a particular candidate can win for whatever desired reason.
How can that be done? Only two ways.
1. remove votes cast for a candidate opposed to the desired winner.
2. change the count of the votes in favor of the desired winner.
The left claims the election was hacked by the russians in favor of Trump. So here is the question:
The left claims Trump is not a legitimate president since the red queen won the popular vote. According to the left since the red queen won the popular vote she is the legitimate winner regardless of what the electoral college vote was.
It is documented the red queen won the popular vote.
The question is, if the russians hacked the election in favor of Trump as is claimed, how did the red queen win the popular vote?
answer: the claim of both is a self-contradictory lie. It is impossible for the russians to "hack" an election in favor of Trump winning and the red queen still win the popular vote.
Otherwise, what exactly did the russians do to "hack" the election?
answer: nothing, it is a lie.
that is why there's been no evidence to back up the claim brought forth, there is none because it didnt happen.