Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by Abraham »

I own a set of the electronic Howard Leight Impact Sport earmuffs that I find uncomfortable after a short time of wearing, so I then find myself pulling them off, forgetting I have them off to find out their off when I shoot my next shot. Ouch!

The H.L. Impact Pro models look far more comfortable while providing far greater noise reduction. I may be getting a pair, maybe...

Do you own both?

What's your comparison perspective? Or, if you only have the Pro model, how do you like them?

More comfortable than the Sport model, the same, or ...?

Thanks!
Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by Abraham »

superchief ,

I do use inner ear custom plugs with the muffs. By themselves, they do not provide enough protection, thus I wear muffs over them that also allow me to hear others speaking. I think a pretty good system, but the Impact Sport models don't allow me, a very long time of wear before they start feeling like a vise as padding around the ear cups is rather thin. The Impact Pro ear cup padding per photos looks far thicker and I hope softer...

However, I'm not looking for advice, I'm looking for others who may have the Impact Pro models with or without a comparison to the Impact Sport model.
User avatar
warnmar10
Senior Member
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 11:57 am

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by warnmar10 »

superchief wrote:... Seriously, electronic muffs are not going to give really effective protection. ...
Why is this?
rotor
Senior Member
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by rotor »

I had the Impact Sport (-22db) and could not get a good ear fit wearing glasses and shooting glasses. I had a big run in with the parent company (Honeywell). Supposedly there is a new model Howard Leight coming out with a faster cut off but if you do not get a good seal on your ears it makes no difference. I use a combo of my molded ear plugs and cheap -30db muffs and I don't care if I can't hear people talking or if I can't listen to bluetooth.
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

If you find the Impact Sport muffs to be uncomfortable, I doubt you'll find any that you like. I have three pairs of Impact Sport muffs because of the design of the head band. The flat portion of the top, as opposed to the standard continuous arc type, greatly reduces the vice-effect on your head. While all muffs eventually get uncomfortable, I can wear the Impact Sport muffs at least three times as long before I have to take them off.

I know of no muffs that will give as good of a seal while wearing glasses as they do without glasses. I bought a cheap pair of earplugs that I'm going to try with my muffs, when I'm in an especially loud environment. They have a hole in the center that can be plugged or left open. I'm going to see how they work. While I have and like custom molded ear plugs, they hurt much faster than any muffs I've used.

You have me thinking about the Howard Leight Impact Pro muffs. I may give them a try.

Chas.
rotor
Senior Member
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by rotor »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:If you find the Impact Sport muffs to be uncomfortable, I doubt you'll find any that you like. I have three pairs of Impact Sport muffs because of the design of the head band. The flat portion of the top, as opposed to the standard continuous arc type, greatly reduces the vice-effect on your head. While all muffs eventually get uncomfortable, I can wear the Impact Sport muffs at least three times as long before I have to take them off.

I know of no muffs that will give as good of a seal while wearing glasses as they do without glasses. I bought a cheap pair of earplugs that I'm going to try with my muffs, when I'm in an especially loud environment. They have a hole in the center that can be plugged or left open. I'm going to see how they work. While I have and like custom molded ear plugs, they hurt much faster than any muffs I've used.

You have me thinking about the Howard Leight Impact Pro muffs. I may give them a try.

Chas.
Must be my head but I get a good seal with my $10 Winchester muffs and I wear glasses and over the glasses eye protection. I never could get a seal with my Howard Leight. The lesson to be learned is to try them on before you buy or buy from a place that will let you return. The only thing I hate about muffs is getting a good cheek placement on my rifle or shotgun.
twomillenium
Senior Member
Posts: 1691
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:42 pm
Location: houston area

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by twomillenium »

I have been wearing Caldwell behind the neck hearing protection and they wear well, I get the needed protection and I can hear students on the line between shots. They are effective even indoors and in enclosed deer stands.
Texas LTC Instructor, NRA pistol instructor, RSO, NRA Endowment Life , TSRA, Glock enthusiast (tho I have others)
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to add it to a fruit salad.

You will never know another me, this could be good or not so good, but it is still true.
Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by Abraham »

I finally realized I can go to Cabelas and try the Impact Pro muffs before buying. I would like to also assess if these muffs will allow me to hook up my MP3 audio book player that will overcome whatever external or even just ambient external/environmental noise. I've tried it with my Impact Sport muffs, but it wasn't effective. Oh, I've discovered the NRR (noise reduction rating) is significantly higher with the Pro model vs. the Impact model too.

I too wear the Winchester muffs and find them vastly superior in comfort to the Impact Sport muffs, but I only use them when I mow with my zero-turn Toro mucho loud mower. The Pro model according to a utube video have a much greater comfort level head band, plus bigger and I assume softer ear cups. When I get around to Cabelas to try them, I'll give a brief review.
User avatar
bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by bblhd672 »

I bought a pair of HL Impact Sport muffs based upon recommendations from forum users. I have a lot of problems getting a good seal around my ears with them, last time at range I think I found the best arrangement. I always wear plugs in addition to muffs anyway because I'm a bit paranoid about protecting my hearing from further damage. The tinnitus I have now is annoying enough.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
User avatar
Pariah3j
Senior Member
Posts: 865
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 5:03 pm
Location: Webster

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by Pariah3j »

I love my HL Impact Sports - bought a 2 pack on Amazon about a year or 2 ago for about the price 1 pair of them goes for. Personally I love them, they sit comfortably on my head/ears, I can/have worn them for 2-3 hours straight at the range without any issue. They safely bring the sound down better then my pair of Howard Leight slim line earmuffs I had before them (I had to double up with ear plugs with those to work properly).

I have however had my eyes on some of these 'MSA Sordin Supreme Pro X with LED Light - Electronic Shooting EarMuff'
But the price to what they offer, I've always wondered if they would be worth it.


EDIT: had to remove the link, wasn't displaying correctly - was linking to them on Amazon.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny" - Thomas Jefferson
Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by Abraham »

Pariah3j,

Researching cost yesterday, I found the Pro model online for $55.00.

I think that a very reasonable cost, but I'm not going to plunk my money down until I see how well they fit...
User avatar
Pariah3j
Senior Member
Posts: 865
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 5:03 pm
Location: Webster

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by Pariah3j »

rotor wrote: Must be my head but I get a good seal with my $10 Winchester muffs and I wear glasses and over the glasses eye protection. I never could get a seal with my Howard Leight. The lesson to be learned is to try them on before you buy or buy from a place that will let you return. The only thing I hate about muffs is getting a good cheek placement on my rifle or shotgun.
:iagree: Getting a good cheek placement is really my only gripe about the Howard Leight Sports, another reason I've looked at some of the other brands of electronic earmuffs.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny" - Thomas Jefferson
Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Howard Leight Impact Sport vs. Impact Pro

Post by Abraham »

I use my Impact model muffs for pistol shooting only and a different non-electronic muffs for rifle.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”