Security guards can now pack heat in public

flintknapper · Post by **flintknapper** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:41 pm

srothstein wrote:
stevie_d_64 wrote:There are probably quite a few things that could be done still, but I'm not so sue the "big" issue list is very long...
I always thought the big issue list was pretty short to begin with. I want Chapter 46 repealed. Everything else is small steps on the way to that goal.

This gets my vote!

maximus2161 · Post by **maximus2161** » Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:55 am

I dont think its a big deal either. More power to them. But I agree, I dont see security companies allowing off duty carry.

Photoman · Post by **Photoman** » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:26 pm

carlson1 wrote:Talking about aesthetic evaluation. We have LE officers that think it's a bad ideal for others to have weapons exept them. Then we have CHLs who think that private citizens should not carry in their vehicle because of no "training." Now we have people thinking it is a bad ideal for security officers who go through more training that the CHL's to carry open. To me it is no worse than politicians saying the 2nd amendment is meant for hunting. We really have met our enemy! You either believe in the right to keep and bear arms or you don't. By the way a CHL is a violation of my rights to do what I already had the right to do to start with

You said it all there brother!