Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

This forum will be open on Sept. 1, 2016.

Moderators: Keith B, Charles L. Cotton, carlson1


Topic author
NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1084
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#1

Post by NotRPB » Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:10 pm

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... nt_id=2982 live stream
Charles is up now

Bill: HB 899
Legislative Session: 85(R) Council Document: 85R 4113 LHC-F
Add to Bill List | Add to Alert List
Last Action: 04/11/2017 H Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
Caption Version: Introduced
Caption Text: Relating to the notice given by a property owner prohibiting a handgun license holder from carrying a handgun on certain property.
Author: Nevárez
Subjects: Weapons (I0887)
INTERNET (S0130)
SIGNS (S0235)
PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPARTMENT OF (V0251)
House Committee: Homeland Security & Public Safety
Status: In committee
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... ll=HB00899
Last edited by NotRPB on Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Vol Texan
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1835
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:18 am
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: Alice's testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#2

Post by Vol Texan » Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:17 pm

And Charles is speaking right now! Go get-em Mr. Cotton!
Your number one option for personal security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.
When those fail, aim for center mass.

www.HoustonLTC.com Texas LTC Instructor & NRA Pistol Instructor | www.Texas3006.com Moderator | Armored Cav. | Tennessee Squire


Topic author
NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1084
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: Alice's testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#3

Post by NotRPB » Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:26 pm

Vol Texan wrote:And Charles is speaking right now! Go get-em Mr. Cotton!
:tiphat: :thumbs2:


hovercat
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:36 am
Location: Pantego, TX

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#4

Post by hovercat » Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:43 pm

Left pending.

User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6565
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#5

Post by ELB » Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:43 pm

So HB 560 is buried in committee without so much as a nod, and (only!) three authors/co-authors signed up, and this trash -- with only the author on record -- gets a public hearing that we have to go out and fight. I expect this bill has little support on the floor, but it is using up valuable legislative time and the only good it will do is to provide some fodder to say "hey we stopped a bad bill!" Which could have been stopped with no effort at all, just like HB 560.

Priorities of the Speaker and his House.
Last edited by ELB on Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
The Most Interesting Texan in the World. :txflag:

User avatar

SRO1911
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 791
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 10:31 pm
Location: Abilene, TX

Re: Alice's testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#6

Post by SRO1911 » Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:43 pm

Missed alice; tubed in just in time for Charles- most excellent.
When any govt, or church,says This you can't read, are forbidden to know, the result is tyranny and oppression. Little force is needed to control a man who has been hoodwinked; no force can control a free man, not the rack, bombs, not anything, you can't conquer a free man, at most you can kill him.


locke_n_load
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 977
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:35 pm

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#7

Post by locke_n_load » Wed Apr 12, 2017 9:32 am

transcripts anyone?
"They that would give up Essential Liberty, for a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

EDC - Glock 26 Gen IV
CHL Holder since 10/08

User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2173
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Elgin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#8

Post by oljames3 » Wed Apr 12, 2017 9:47 am

locke_n_load wrote:transcripts anyone?
Video is archived at:
http://www.house.state.tx.us/video-audi ... dcasts/85/ for the main menu.

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13483 for Homeland Security & Public Safety, 4/11/17.

Works for me in Microsoft Edge. Not in Chrome. Your mileage will vary.
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
2/19FA, 1st Cavalry Division 73-78; 56FA BDE (Pershing) 78-81
NRA Distinguished Life Member (Disabled Vet), TSRA, NAR L1

User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 16597
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#9

Post by WildBill » Wed Apr 12, 2017 9:47 am

oljames3 wrote:
locke_n_load wrote:transcripts anyone?
Video is archived at:
http://www.house.state.tx.us/video-audi ... dcasts/85/ for the main menu.

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13483 for Homeland Security & Public Safety, 4/11/17.

Works for me in Microsoft Edge. Not in Chrome. Your mileage will vary.
Thank you for posting the link! Microsoft Edge works for me.
NRA Endowment Member

User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2173
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Elgin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#10

Post by oljames3 » Wed Apr 12, 2017 9:59 am

WildBill wrote:
oljames3 wrote:
locke_n_load wrote:transcripts anyone?
Video is archived at:
http://www.house.state.tx.us/video-audi ... dcasts/85/ for the main menu.

http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13483 for Homeland Security & Public Safety, 4/11/17.

Works for me in Microsoft Edge. Not in Chrome. Your mileage will vary.
Thank you for posting the link! Microsoft Edge works for me.
Charles and Alice are on a later session at:
http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13496
Alice start about 4 hours, 17 minutes. Poncho is holding forth before that.
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
2/19FA, 1st Cavalry Division 73-78; 56FA BDE (Pershing) 78-81
NRA Distinguished Life Member (Disabled Vet), TSRA, NAR L1


Topic author
NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1084
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#11

Post by NotRPB » Wed Apr 12, 2017 10:01 am

:iagree: you beat me to it
link above was morning
here is Afternoon with Alice and Charles on gunbuster sign bill (Podium instead of seated panels)
Fast Forward to 4:12
http://tlchouse.granicus.com/MediaPlaye ... p_id=13496

I'd love to drug test the (time release?) sprinkles at that cupcake shop "crazy pills" ? (just kidding) :mrgreen:


Topic author
NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1084
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#12

Post by NotRPB » Wed Apr 12, 2017 10:44 am

At 4:42 some woman lies & says Intent of Texas30.06 site is to alert us to non-compliant signs or something ...However, I use it and the App to know what businesses to avoid that post signs saying they don't want my business as a law abiding citizen.


cyphertext
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:31 am

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#13

Post by cyphertext » Wed Apr 12, 2017 11:47 am

Since the congressman was quick to point to other states who have the gunbuster type signs like Oklahoma, I wish someone would have pointed out that those signs have no force of law. I'd be fine with going with the gunbuster sign, provided that it had no force of law or penalties by just carrying past it.


Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#14

Post by Soccerdad1995 » Wed Apr 12, 2017 11:57 am

cyphertext wrote:Since the congressman was quick to point to other states who have the gunbuster type signs like Oklahoma, I wish someone would have pointed out that those signs have no force of law. I'd be fine with going with the gunbuster sign, provided that it had no force of law or penalties by just carrying past it.
:iagree:

Florida is another example.

We are not talking about an onerous regulation being placed on a business by the government. We are simply saying that if a private business wants to have the free use of law enforcement officers to enforce their business policies, then they need to put up a specific type of sign.

What we should be talking about is why anyone thinks it is appropriate to use publicly funded law enforcement officers to enforce a businesses' policies. Someone not following all of your rules should not be a crime unless they refuse to leave when asked.

And let's just conveniently ignore that we are talking about an underlying policy that is definitely NOT in the public interest since it increases the risk of injury and death for everyone in that location. If anything, police should be used to prevent the enforcement of dangerous business policies such as this.
Ding dong, the witch is dead


Scott Farkus
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Alice's and Charles' testimony was great on Gunbuster sign Bill

#15

Post by Scott Farkus » Wed Apr 12, 2017 12:55 pm

cyphertext wrote:Since the congressman was quick to point to other states who have the gunbuster type signs like Oklahoma, I wish someone would have pointed out that those signs have no force of law. I'd be fine with going with the gunbuster sign, provided that it had no force of law or penalties by just carrying past it.
Absolutely this.

Locked

Return to “2017 Texas Legislative Session”